Zuelke Andrea E, Luppa Melanie, Löbner Margrit, Pabst Alexander, Schlapke Christine, Stein Janine, Riedel-Heller Steffi G
Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 8;8(12):e29661. doi: 10.2196/29661.
Although grief and its symptoms constitute a normal reaction to experiences of loss, some of those affected still report elevated levels of distress after an extended period, often termed complicated grief. Beneficial treatment effects of face-to-face therapies, for example, grief counseling or cognitive behavioral therapy against complicated grief, have been reported. Evaluations of internet- and mobile-based interventions targeting symptoms of grief in bereaved individuals with regard to objective quality criteria are currently lacking.
We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness and feasibility of internet- and mobile-based interventions against symptoms of grief after bereavement.
We conducted systematic literature searches of randomized controlled trials or feasibility studies published before January 9, 2020, following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system. We further assessed aspects of feasibility and rated quality of interventions using criteria suggested by an expert panel on mental health care (German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to assess between-group effect sizes.
In total, 9 trials (N=1349) were included. Of these, 7 studies were analyzed meta-analytically. Significant effects were found for symptoms of grief (g=0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.77), depression (g=0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.68), and posttraumatic stress (g=0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.01). Heterogeneity was moderate for grief and depression (I=48.75% and 55.19%, respectively) and low for posttraumatic stress symptoms (I=0%). The overall quality of evidence was graded low (grief and depression) to moderate (posttraumatic stress). User satisfaction with the interventions was high, as was the quality of the interventions assessed using objective quality criteria.
Internet- or mobile-based interventions might constitute an effective treatment approach against symptoms of grief in bereaved adults. However, the small sample sizes and limited number of studies included in the review warrant further investigation.
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42012002100; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=131428.
尽管悲伤及其症状是对丧失经历的正常反应,但一些受影响的人在很长一段时间后仍报告有较高的痛苦水平,这种情况通常被称为复杂性悲伤。例如,有报告称面对面治疗,如悲伤咨询或认知行为疗法对复杂性悲伤有有益的治疗效果。目前缺乏针对客观质量标准对丧亲个体悲伤症状的基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施的评估。
我们旨在对基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施对丧亲后悲伤症状的有效性和可行性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们按照PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,在PubMed、PsycINFO、科学引文索引核心合集和Cochrane图书馆中对2020年1月9日前发表的随机对照试验或可行性研究进行了系统的文献检索。使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价系统评估证据质量。我们还评估了可行性方面,并根据精神卫生保健专家小组(德国精神病学、心理治疗和身心医学协会)建议的标准对干预措施的质量进行了评级。进行随机效应荟萃分析以评估组间效应大小。
总共纳入了9项试验(N = 1349)。其中,7项研究进行了荟萃分析。发现对悲伤症状(g = 0.54,95%CI 0.32 - 0.77)、抑郁(g = 0.44,95%CI 0.20 - 0.68)和创伤后应激(g = 0.82,95%CI 0.63 - 1.01)有显著影响。悲伤和抑郁的异质性为中度(分别为I = 48.75%和55.19%),创伤后应激症状的异质性为低度(I = 0%)。证据的总体质量分级为低(悲伤和抑郁)到中度(创伤后应激)。用户对干预措施的满意度较高,使用客观质量标准评估的干预措施质量也较高。
基于互联网或移动设备的干预措施可能是治疗丧亲成年人悲伤症状的有效方法。然而,本综述纳入的样本量较小且研究数量有限,需要进一步研究。
国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)CRD42012002100;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=131428