Batalha Ana Paula Delgado Bomtempo, Ponciano Isabela Coelho, Chaves Gabriela, Felício Diogo Carvalho, Britto Raquel Rodrigues, da Silva Lilian Pinto
Graduate Program in Rehabilitation and Physical-Functional Performance Sciences, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG Brazil.
Myant Inc., Toronto, ON Canada.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021 Jul 15;20(2):1815-1836. doi: 10.1007/s40200-021-00846-8. eCollection 2021 Dec.
This study aimed to identify the characteristics of interventions employed to promote behavior change in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and their impact on disease self-management and glycated hemoglobin (A1c).
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to guide the protocol development for this systematic review. Randomized controlled clinical trials which compared behavior change interventions to controls in adults with T2DM and investigated disease self-management and glycated hemoglobin (A1c) measured by validated methods were eligible for this study. The risk of bias and quality of evidence was assessed respectively by Cochrane's tool and grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE).
A total of 27 studies were included involving 4464 participants. Behavior change was mainly promoted by education sessions on diabetes care delivered face-to-face, monthly, or every other month, lasting more than 60 min, involving blood glucose monitoring, healthy eating, exercise, and medication. Four studies showed significant improvement in both disease self-management and A1c. The risk of bias was classified as high in most studies. A meta-analysis could not be performed for A1c and self-management due to the high differences in intervention parameters (delivery mode, number, duration, and frequency) and self-management assessments.
Low evidence of improvement in disease self-management and A1c considering only validated assessment methods were found for behavior change interventions, mainly promoted by education sessions on diabetes care. The quality of studies and probably the differences in intervention protocols contributed to this finding.
CRD42020161162.
本研究旨在确定用于促进2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者行为改变的干预措施的特征及其对疾病自我管理和糖化血红蛋白(A1c)的影响。
采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南指导本系统评价的方案制定。将行为改变干预措施与T2DM成人对照组进行比较,并采用经验证的方法调查疾病自我管理和糖化血红蛋白(A1c)的随机对照临床试验符合本研究要求。分别采用Cochrane工具和推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)对偏倚风险和证据质量进行评估。
共纳入27项研究,涉及4464名参与者。行为改变主要通过面对面、每月或每隔一月进行的糖尿病护理教育课程来促进,课程持续时间超过60分钟,内容包括血糖监测、健康饮食、运动和用药。四项研究表明疾病自我管理和A1c均有显著改善。大多数研究的偏倚风险被归类为高。由于干预参数(实施方式、数量、持续时间和频率)和自我管理评估存在高度差异,无法对A1c和自我管理进行Meta分析。
仅考虑经验证的评估方法,发现行为改变干预措施对疾病自我管理和A1c改善的证据不足,行为改变主要由糖尿病护理教育课程促进。研究质量以及干预方案的差异可能导致了这一结果。
PROSPERO编号:CRD42020161162。