Suppr超能文献

新鸟亚纲鸟类的深度分化:形态特征的系统发育分析

The deep divergences of neornithine birds: a phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters.

作者信息

Mayr Gerald, Clarke Julia

机构信息

Section of Ornithology, Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Section of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 10024, USA.

出版信息

Cladistics. 2003 Dec;19(6):527-553. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.tb00387.x.

Abstract

Consensus is elusive regarding the phylogenetic relationships among neornithine (crown clade) birds. The ongoing debate over their deep divergences is despite recent increases in available molecular sequence data and the publication of several larger morphological data sets. In the present study, the phylogenetic relationships among 43 neornithine higher taxa are addressed using a data set of 148 osteological and soft tissue characters, which is one of the largest to date. The Mesozoic non-neornithine birds Apsaravis, Hesperornis, and Ichthyornis are used as outgroup taxa for this analysis. Thus, for the first time, a broad array of morphological characters (including both cranial and postcranial characters) are analyzed for an ingroup densely sampling Neornithes, with crown clade outgroups used to polarize these characters. The strict consensus cladogram of two most parsimonious trees resultant from 1000 replicate heuristic searches (random stepwise addition, tree-bisection-reconnection) recovered several previously identified clades; the at-one-time contentious clades Galloanseres (waterfowl, fowl, and allies) and Palaeognathae were supported. Most notably, our analysis recovered monophyly of Neoaves, i.e., all neognathous birds to the exclusion of the Galloanseres, although this clade was weakly supported. The recently proposed sister taxon relationship between Steatornithidae (oilbird) and Trogonidae (trogons) was recovered. The traditional taxon "Falconiformes" (Cathartidae, Sagittariidae, Accipitridae, and Falconidae) was not found to be monophyletic, as Strigiformes (owls) are placed as the sister taxon of (Falconidae + Accipitridae). Monophyly of the traditional "Gruiformes" (cranes and allies) and "Ciconiiformes" (storks and allies) was also not recovered. The primary analysis resulted in support for a sister group relationship between Gaviidae (loons) and Podicipedidae (grebes)-foot-propelled diving birds that share many features of the pelvis and hind limb. Exclusion of Gaviidae and reanalysis of the data set, however, recovered the sister group relationship between Phoenicopteridae (flamingos) and grebes recently proposed from molecular sequence data.

摘要

关于新鸟亚纲(冠类分支)鸟类之间的系统发育关系,目前尚未达成共识。尽管最近可用的分子序列数据有所增加,并且发表了几个更大的形态学数据集,但关于它们深层次分歧的争论仍在继续。在本研究中,使用包含148个骨骼和软组织特征的数据集来探讨43个新鸟亚纲高级分类单元之间的系统发育关系,该数据集是迄今为止最大的数据集之一。中生代非新鸟亚纲鸟类阿普萨拉鸟、黄昏鸟和鱼鸟被用作此次分析的外类群分类单元。因此,首次对一个密集采样新鸟类的内类群分析了广泛的形态特征(包括颅骨和颅后特征),并使用冠类分支外类群来确定这些特征的极性。通过1000次重复启发式搜索(随机逐步添加、树二分重连)得到的两棵最简约树的严格合意分支图恢复了几个先前确定的分支;曾经有争议的分支鸡雁小纲(水禽、家禽及近缘类群)和古颚类得到了支持。最值得注意的是,我们的分析恢复了今鸟亚纲的单系性,即所有新颚类鸟类,但不包括鸡雁小纲,尽管这个分支的支持力度较弱。最近提出的油鸱科(油鸱)和咬鹃科(咬鹃)之间的姐妹分类单元关系也得到了恢复。传统分类单元“隼形目”(美洲鹫科、蛇鹫科、鹰科和隼科)并非单系类群,因为鸮形目(猫头鹰)被置于(隼科 + 鹰科)的姐妹分类单元位置。传统的“鹤形目”(鹤及近缘类群)和“鹳形目”(鹳及近缘类群)的单系性也未得到恢复。初步分析支持了潜鸟科(潜鸟)和䴙䴘科(䴙䴘)之间的姐妹群关系,这两类靠足部推进的潜水鸟类在骨盆和后肢方面有许多共同特征。然而,排除潜鸟科并重新分析数据集后,恢复了最近从分子序列数据中提出的红鹳科(火烈鸟)和䴙䴘之间的姐妹群关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验