Suppr超能文献

实验室自建实时 RT-PCR 方法检测自采唾液标本中 SARS-CoV-2 的性能准确性。

Performance Accuracy of a Laboratory-Developed Real-Time RT-PCR Method for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Self-Collected Saliva Specimens.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2021 Nov;51(6):741-749.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has challenged diagnostic laboratories to re-examine traditional methods for collecting specimens and sample types used in molecular testing. Our goal was to demonstrate that saliva can be used for detecting SARS-CoV-2 and correlates well with established molecular methods using nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs.

METHODS

We examined use of a saliva collection device in conjunction with a laboratory-developed real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (LDPCR) method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in a symptomatic population and compared results with 2 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved methods (emergency use authorization [EUA]) that use specimens from NP swabs.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of LDPCR compared with the reference methods was 75.0% (21/28); specificity, 98.1% (104/106). When cycle threshold values were compared between paired specimens using the LDPCR and a EUA reverse transcription PCR method, both targeting the open-reading frame gene, the mean value for saliva was 4.66 cycles higher than for NP specimens.

CONCLUSION

Use of self-collected saliva in conjunction with an LDPCR for SARS-CoV-2 compared favorably with 2 FDA EUA methods using NP swabs. The use of an alternative sample type and assay method will aid in expanding the availability of testing during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

目的

由 SARS-CoV-2 引起的持续的 COVID-19 大流行,使诊断实验室重新审视传统的标本采集方法和用于分子检测的样本类型。我们的目标是证明唾液可用于检测 SARS-CoV-2,与使用鼻咽拭子(NP 拭子)的既定分子方法具有良好的相关性。

方法

我们检查了在有症状人群中使用唾液采集装置结合实验室开发的实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(LDPCR)方法检测 SARS-CoV-2 的情况,并将结果与使用 NP 拭子标本的 2 种美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的方法(紧急使用授权[EUA])进行了比较。

结果

LDPCR 与参考方法相比的灵敏度为 75.0%(21/28);特异性为 98.1%(104/106)。当使用 LDPCR 和针对开放阅读框基因的 EUA 逆转录 PCR 方法比较配对标本的循环阈值时,唾液的平均值比 NP 标本高 4.66 个循环。

结论

与使用 NP 拭子的 2 种 FDA EUA 方法相比,使用自我采集的唾液结合 LDPCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的效果较好。使用替代样本类型和检测方法将有助于在持续的 COVID-19 大流行期间扩大检测的可用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验