Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Endocrinology and Diabetes Units, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1;182(2):106-114. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6373.
Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) is common and associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Antenatal lifestyle interventions limit GWG; yet benefits of different intervention types and specific maternal and neonatal outcomes are unclear.
To evaluate the association of different types of diet and physical activity-based antenatal lifestyle interventions with GWG and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
A 2-stage systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Health Technology Assessment Database was conducted from February 1, 2017, to May 31, 2020. Search results from the present study were integrated with those from a previous systematic review from 1990 to February 2017.
Randomized trials reporting GWG and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Data were extracted for random-effects meta-analyses to calculate the summary effect estimates and 95% CIs.
Outcomes were clinically prioritized, with mean GWG as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean section, preterm delivery, large or small for gestational age neonates, neonatal intensive care unit admission, or fetal death.
A total of 117 randomized clinical trials of antenatal lifestyle interventions (involving 34 546 women) were included. Overall lifestyle intervention was associated with reduced GWG (-1.15 kg; 95% CI, -1.40 to -0.91), risk of gestational diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.89), and total adverse maternal outcomes (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94) vs routine care. Compared with routine care, diet was associated with less GWG (-2.63 kg; 95% CI, -3.87 to -1.40) than physical activity (-1.04 kg; 95% CI, -1.33 to -0.74) or mixed interventions (eg, unstructured lifestyle support, written information with weight monitoring, or behavioral support alone) (-0.74 kg; 95% CI, -1.06 to -0.43). Diet was associated with reduced risk of gestational diabetes (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.82), preterm delivery (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.84), large for gestational age neonate (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.47), neonatal intensive care admission (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.95), and total adverse maternal (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92) and neonatal outcomes (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.72). Physical activity was associated with reduced GWG and reduced risk of gestational diabetes (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47-0.75), hypertensive disorders (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90), cesarean section (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95), and total adverse maternal outcomes (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86). Diet with physical activity was associated with reduced GWG (-1.35 kg; 95% CI, -1.95 to -0.75) and reduced risk of gestational diabetes (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96) and total adverse maternal outcomes (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95). Mixed interventions were associated with reduced GWG only.
This systematic review and meta-analysis found level 1 evidence that antenatal structured diet and physical activity-based lifestyle interventions were associated with reduced GWG and lower risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The findings support the implementation of such interventions in routine antenatal care and policy around the world.
过度的妊娠体重增加(GWG)很常见,并且与不良的妊娠结局有关。产前生活方式干预可以限制 GWG;然而,不同干预类型的益处以及特定的母婴结局尚不清楚。
评估不同类型的饮食和基于体力活动的产前生活方式干预与 GWG 以及母婴结局的关系。
2017 年 2 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 31 日,对 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、效果摘要数据库、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和卫生技术评估数据库进行了 2 阶段系统文献检索。本研究的检索结果与 1990 年至 2017 年 2 月的先前系统评价的检索结果进行了整合。
报告 GWG 和母婴结局的随机试验。
对随机效应荟萃分析进行了数据提取,以计算汇总效果估计值和 95%置信区间。
根据临床优先顺序确定结局,平均 GWG 为主要结局。次要结局包括妊娠糖尿病、妊娠高血压疾病、剖宫产、早产、胎儿大小与胎龄不符、新生儿重症监护病房入院或胎儿死亡。
共纳入 117 项产前生活方式干预的随机临床试验(涉及 34546 名女性)。整体生活方式干预与 GWG 减少(-1.15kg;95%CI,-1.40 至-0.91)、妊娠糖尿病风险(比值比[OR],0.79;95%CI,0.70-0.89)和总不良母婴结局(OR,0.89;95%CI,0.84-0.94)相关,与常规护理相比。与常规护理相比,饮食干预(-2.63kg;95%CI,-3.87 至-1.40)与体力活动干预(-1.04kg;95%CI,-1.33 至-0.74)或混合干预(例如,非结构化生活方式支持、带有体重监测的书面信息或单独的行为支持)(-0.74kg;95%CI,-1.06 至-0.43)相比,GWG 减少的风险更小。饮食干预与妊娠糖尿病风险降低(OR,0.61;95%CI,0.45-0.82)、早产(OR,0.43;95%CI,0.22-0.84)、胎儿大小与胎龄不符(OR,0.19;95%CI,0.08-0.47)、新生儿重症监护病房入院(OR,0.68;95%CI,0.48-0.95)和总不良母婴(OR,0.75;95%CI,0.61-0.92)和新生儿结局(OR,0.44;95%CI,0.26-0.72)相关。体力活动与 GWG 减少和妊娠糖尿病风险降低(OR,0.60;95%CI,0.47-0.75)、高血压疾病(OR,0.66;95%CI,0.48-0.90)、剖宫产(OR,0.85;95%CI,0.75-0.95)和总不良母婴结局(OR,0.78;95%CI,0.71-0.86)相关。饮食与体力活动联合干预与 GWG 减少(-1.35kg;95%CI,-1.95 至-0.75)和妊娠糖尿病风险降低(OR,0.72;95%CI,0.54-0.96)以及总不良母婴结局(OR,0.81;95%CI,0.69-0.95)相关。混合干预仅与 GWG 减少相关。
本系统评价和荟萃分析发现,一级证据表明产前基于结构化饮食和体力活动的生活方式干预与 GWG 减少和母婴不良结局风险降低相关。研究结果支持在全球范围内将此类干预措施纳入常规产前护理和政策中。