Lesac Brizić Ana, Mozetič Vladimir
Community Health Center of Primorje - Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia.
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Dec 14;14:9689-9696. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S338499. eCollection 2021.
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) can have an etiology outside the lower urinary tract (LUT) and are therefore an important diagnostic indicator for assessing the overall health of a person. However, LUTS is still mainly neglected by primary health care providers as well as by patients. In this study, we assessed the importance of an educational interview (EI) conducted by a GP on the patients' ability to recognize LUTS. We also investigated other factors that affect the recognition of LUTS: subjects' personal educational level, number of LUT symptoms and their bothersome level on a scale 0-10.
This cross-sectional study was conducted in Croatia (2018-2020) by interviewing 499 subjects. We compared recognized LUT symptoms before and after the EI and determined whether their number, their bothersome level, or the subjects' personal educational level were associated with LUTS recognition.
EI significantly improved the ability to recognize LUTS (p=0.001). The number of LUT symptoms and bothersome level in subjects before EI was much greater than the number in subjects after EI (p<0.0001, mean>4 and p<0.0001, median>8, respectively). Subjects with higher educational level recognized LUTS with fewer symptoms after the EI (p<0.01), but no difference was observed among subjects who recognized LUTS before the EI.
For subjects to recognize LUTS, their condition had to be severe - more than 4 symptoms and bothersome level >8/10. Personal educational level had little impact on LUTS recognition. However, an EI proved to be an excellent tool for raising awareness about LUTS and its early recognition.
下尿路症状(LUTS)可能存在下尿路(LUT)以外的病因,因此是评估一个人整体健康状况的重要诊断指标。然而,LUTS仍然主要被初级医疗保健提供者以及患者所忽视。在本研究中,我们评估了全科医生(GP)进行的教育访谈(EI)对患者识别LUTS能力的重要性。我们还调查了影响LUTS识别的其他因素:受试者的个人教育水平、LUT症状数量及其在0至10分量表上的困扰程度。
本横断面研究于2018年至2020年在克罗地亚进行,共访谈了499名受试者。我们比较了EI前后识别出的LUT症状,并确定症状数量、困扰程度或受试者的个人教育水平是否与LUTS识别相关。
EI显著提高了识别LUTS的能力(p = 0.001)。EI前受试者的LUT症状数量和困扰程度远高于EI后受试者(分别为p < 0.0001,平均值>4;p < 0.0001,中位数>8)。教育水平较高的受试者在EI后识别较少症状的LUTS(p < 0.01),但在EI前识别LUTS的受试者之间未观察到差异。
受试者要识别LUTS,其病情必须严重——超过4种症状且困扰程度>8/10。个人教育水平对LUTS识别影响不大。然而,EI被证明是提高对LUTS及其早期识别认识的极佳工具。