Suppr超能文献

循环生物经济:基于当前和未来电力组合,从桔皮废物规模化梯级生产的生命周期评价。

Circular bioeconomy: Life cycle assessment of scaled-up cascading production from orange peel waste under current and future electricity mixes.

机构信息

Research Group on EcoIndustrial System Analysis, Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, Postboks 358, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark; Aarhus University Centre for Circular Bioeconomy, Denmark.

TBI, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 15;812:152574. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152574. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

Abstract

Orange peel waste (OPW) is present in large quantities both locally and globally, which makes them feasible input into the circular bioeconomy. However, due to their antimicrobial and anti-nutritional activity, they are problematic biomass, and proper waste management is yet to be determined. This life cycle assessment (LCA) quantifies the environmental performance of biorefinery producing limonene, citric acid, and animal feed from OPW generated from juice factories. Only previously assessed sustainable technologies were considered (cold press, microwave extraction, solid-state fermentation). The life cycle inventories were refined by a scale-up procedure to reflect industrial production at i) 0.5 t, ii) 100 t, and iii) 1000 t of OPW weekly. The data were translated per functional unit of 1 tonne OPW. Three electricity mixes and both attributional (average) and consequential (marginal) inventories were compared. Results showed that the environmental performance, in particular for climate change, was essentially dependent upon the electricity input, with 4388 CO eq for current electricity mix, 2404 CO eq using renewable, and 594 CO eq using electricity from wind. Business-as-usual scenarios for OPW (incineration and animal feed) showed better performance in most scenarios, representing -150 CO eq (animal feed) and -135 CO eq (incineration) in the climate change. Lower impacts are reached due to avoided impacts of fossil fuel use and conventional feed cultivation. Renewable energy had better environmental performance than the current electricity mix, except for eutrophication, due to digestate spreading associated with biogas use, calling for mitigation action. Our results suggest that stopping the biorefinery processes immediately after the recovery of limonene via solvent-free microwave extraction process, with subsequent use of the dried OPW as animal feed, is the most environmentally performant option. This represents a feasible strategy for the circular bioeconomy and is in line with the updated food waste hierarchy.

摘要

橙皮废料(OPW)在本地和全球都大量存在,这使得它们成为循环生物经济中可行的投入物。然而,由于其具有抗菌和抗营养活性,它们是有问题的生物质,因此仍需确定适当的废物管理方法。本生命周期评估(LCA)量化了从果汁厂产生的橙皮废料中生产柠檬烯、柠檬酸和动物饲料的生物精炼厂的环境绩效。仅考虑了以前评估过的可持续技术(冷榨、微波提取、固态发酵)。通过扩大规模程序对生命周期清单进行了细化,以反映每周处理 0.5 吨、100 吨和 1000 吨 OPW 的工业生产情况。数据按每 1 吨 OPW 的功能单位进行转换。比较了三种电力组合以及归因(平均)和后果(边际)清单。结果表明,环境绩效,特别是气候变化方面,主要取决于电力输入,目前电力组合的 COeq 为 4388,使用可再生能源的 COeq 为 2404,使用风力发电的 COeq 为 594。OPW 的常规情景(焚烧和动物饲料)在大多数情况下表现更好,在气候变化方面分别达到-150 COeq(动物饲料)和-135 COeq(焚烧)。由于避免了化石燃料使用和传统饲料种植的影响,因此达到了更低的影响。可再生能源的环境性能优于当前的电力组合,除了富营养化,这是由于沼气使用相关的消化物扩散所致,需要采取缓解措施。我们的研究结果表明,在溶剂免费微波提取工艺回收柠檬烯后,立即停止生物精炼过程,随后将干燥的 OPW 用作动物饲料,是最具环境性能的选择。这代表了循环生物经济的可行策略,符合更新后的食物废物层次结构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验