Respiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford Respiratory NIHR BRC, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Feb;10(2):410-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.12.014. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
The availability of a range of new biological treatments targeting type-2 inflammation has provided new opportunities for patients with more severe asthma. Treatment has a bigger effect on exacerbations than day-to-day symptoms, and efficacy increases with increasing intensity of type-2 airway inflammation as reflected by the blood eosinophil count and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. The similarity of the clinical effects and target populations coupled with the absence of direct head-to-head comparative data makes it difficult to choose the right biologic for a given patient. In this review, we summarize the key efficacy data from phase 3 trials; discuss indirect comparisons; review clinical and laboratory variables that may be associated with a differential response to treatment; outline practical considerations that might be important to individual patients; and suggest an algorithm for choosing the most appropriate biologic to start with and the first choice to switch to.
一系列针对 2 型炎症的新型生物疗法的出现为更严重哮喘患者提供了新的机会。治疗对加重期的影响大于日常症状,并且疗效随着血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数和呼出气一氧化氮分数等 2 型气道炎症的强度增加而增加。由于缺乏直接的头对头比较数据,临床效果和目标人群的相似性使得很难为特定患者选择正确的生物制剂。在这篇综述中,我们总结了 3 期临床试验的关键疗效数据;讨论间接比较;综述可能与治疗反应差异相关的临床和实验室变量;概述对个体患者可能重要的实际考虑因素;并提出一种选择最合适的生物制剂开始治疗和首选转换的算法。