Department of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, 1 Distillery Road, Lower Newcastle, Galway, Ireland.
Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Dec 27;22(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01603-9.
Although patients have the potential to provide important information on patient safety, considerably fewer patient-report measures of safety climate (SC) have been applied in the primary care setting as compared to secondary care. Our aim was to examine the application of a patient-report measure of safety climate in an Irish population to understand patient perceptions of safety in general practice and identify potential areas for improvement. Specifically, our research questions were: 1. What are patients' perceptions of SC in Irish general practice? 2. Do patient risk factors impact perceptions of SC? 3. Do patient responses to an open-ended question about safety enhance our understanding of patient safety beyond that obtained from a quantitative measure of SC?
The Patient Perspective of Safety in General Practice (PPS-GP) survey was distributed to primary care patients in Ireland. The survey consisted of both Likert-response items, and free-text entry questions in relation to the safety of care. A series of five separate hierarchical regressions were used to examine the relationship between a range of patient-related variables and each of the survey subscales. A deductive content analysis approach was used to code the free-text responses.
A total of 584 completed online and paper surveys were received. Respondents generally had positive perceptions of safety across all five SC subscales of the PPS-GP. Regarding patient risk factors, younger age and being of non-Irish nationality were consistently associated with more negative SC perceptions. Analysis of the free-text responses revealed considerably poorer patient perceptions (n = 85, 65.4%) of the safety experience in primary care.
Our findings indicate that despite being under-utilised, patients' perceptions are a valuable source of information for measuring SC, with promising implications for safety improvement in general practice. Further consideration should be given to how best to utilise this data in order to improve safety in primary care.
尽管患者有可能提供有关患者安全的重要信息,但与二级医疗机构相比,应用于初级保健环境的患者报告的安全氛围(SC)测量方法要少得多。我们的目的是检查在爱尔兰人群中应用患者报告的安全氛围测量方法,以了解患者对一般实践中的安全性的看法,并确定潜在的改进领域。具体而言,我们的研究问题是:1. 爱尔兰一般实践中的患者对 SC 的看法是什么?2. 患者的风险因素是否会影响对 SC 的看法?3. 患者对有关安全性的开放式问题的回答是否会增强我们对患者安全的理解,超出从 SC 的定量测量中获得的理解?
向爱尔兰的初级保健患者分发了一般实践中的患者安全观点(PPS-GP)调查。该调查包括李克特反应项目以及与护理安全性相关的自由文本条目。使用一系列五个单独的分层回归来检查一系列患者相关变量与调查子量表之间的关系。使用演绎内容分析方法对自由文本回复进行编码。
共收到 584 份在线和纸质调查的回复。受访者普遍对 PPS-GP 的所有五个 SC 子量表的安全性都有积极的看法。关于患者的风险因素,年龄较小和非爱尔兰国籍与更负面的 SC 看法始终相关。对自由文本回复的分析显示,患者对初级保健中安全性的看法要差得多(n=85,65.4%)。
我们的发现表明,尽管利用率较低,但患者的看法是衡量 SC 的宝贵信息来源,这对改善一般实践中的安全性具有广阔的前景。应进一步考虑如何最好地利用这些数据以提高初级保健中的安全性。