Department of Interventional Radiology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Mar;47(3):1157-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03395-z. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
Amebic liver abscess is the most common type of liver abscess on a worldwide basis, with caudate lobe being a relatively uncommon location for its occurrence. Abscess in caudate lobe of liver is often considered a challenging location for image-guided percutaneous drainage due to its difficult-to-access location along with close relationship with major vessels at porta hepatis.
This study aims to demonstrate safety and efficacy of percutaneous drainage for caudate lobe amebic abscess.
In this retrospective study, hospital database was electronically searched for patients having caudate lobe amebic abscess that underwent percutaneous catheter drainage/needle aspiration (PCD/PNA) between January 2016 and January 2021. The etiology, risk factors, microbiology, complications, different approaches for PCD/PNA, and their outcome were studied and reported.
Of 30 patients having caudate lobe amebic abscess treated with PCD/PNA, solitary caudate lobe abscess was seen in 29, whereas one patient had more than one abscesses in caudate lobe. Contained and free intraperitoneal rupture of the abscess were seen in 9 (30%) and one patient, respectively. Ten (32%) patients had associated vascular thrombosis, while 2 patients were found to have abscess-biliary communication. Twenty-six (86.7%) patients were treated with PCD, while remaining 4 (13.3%) with PNA. On Univariate analysis, factors such as volume, multilocularity, and contained rupture of the abscess were found to be significantly increasing the duration of percutaneous drainage (PCD), while only multilocularity (p value 0.007) continued to show statistical significance on Multivariate analysis. Venous thrombosis and duration of catheter drainage were the two factors found to have significant influence on the length of hospital stay on Univariate as well as Multivariate analysis (p value 0.05 and 0.001, respectively). The rates of catheter manipulation were also significantly higher in patients with abscess showing complex internal configuration (heteroechoic contents and/or multilocularity). Technical and clinical success rates of 100% and 96.7% were achieved through percutaneous interventions (PCD/PNA), despite the complex location of abscesses and associated complications, with no incidence of vascular injury.
Liver abscess in caudate lobe can be accessed by different routes for percutaneous drainage, despite being surrounded by large vessels and its deep location, without major complications. Thus, PCD/PNA may be considered as a first-line therapy for the management of caudate lobe amebic abscesses in adjunct to medical therapy.
阿米巴性肝脓肿是全球最常见的肝脓肿类型,而尾状叶是其相对少见的发生部位。由于尾状叶位置较深且紧邻肝门部大血管,因此对于影像引导下经皮穿刺引流而言,其脓肿部位较难到达,属于具有挑战性的部位。
本研究旨在证明经皮引流治疗肝尾状叶阿米巴脓肿的安全性和有效性。
本回顾性研究通过电子检索 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间接受经皮导管引流/针吸术(PCD/PNA)治疗的尾状叶阿米巴性肝脓肿患者的医院数据库。研究并报告了病因、危险因素、微生物学、并发症、PCD/PNA 的不同方法及其结果。
30 例接受 PCD/PNA 治疗的肝尾状叶阿米巴脓肿患者中,29 例为单发尾状叶脓肿,1 例为多个尾状叶脓肿。9 例(30%)患者脓肿为包裹性腹腔内破裂,1 例患者为游离性腹腔内破裂。10 例(32%)患者合并血管血栓形成,2 例患者发现脓肿-胆系相通。26 例(86.7%)患者接受 PCD 治疗,4 例(13.3%)患者接受 PNA 治疗。单因素分析发现,脓肿体积、多房性和包裹性破裂是延长经皮引流(PCD)时间的显著因素,而只有多房性(p 值 0.007)在多因素分析中仍具有统计学意义。静脉血栓形成和导管引流时间是单因素和多因素分析中均对住院时间有显著影响的两个因素(p 值分别为 0.05 和 0.001)。脓肿呈复杂内部结构(回声不均质内容物和/或多房性)的患者需要进行更多的导管操作。经皮介入(PCD/PNA)的技术和临床成功率均达到 100%和 96.7%,尽管脓肿位置复杂并伴有相关并发症,但未发生血管损伤。
即使尾状叶被大血管包围且位置较深,仍可通过不同途径进行经皮引流,不会发生严重并发症。因此,PCD/PNA 可考虑作为辅助药物治疗的肝尾状叶阿米巴脓肿的一线治疗方法。