Department of Poultry Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland; Department of Animal Nutrition, The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition Polish Academy of Sciences, Instytucka 3, 05-110, Jabłonna, Poland.
Chr. Hansen A/S, Boege Allé 10-12, 2970, Hoersholm, Denmark.
Vet Microbiol. 2022 Feb;265:109323. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109323. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
Dietary supplementation with spore-forming Bacillus-based probiotics represents an efficient means to improve gut health while maintaining good broiler performance. This study investigated the potential of two probiotic products in chickens subjected to optimal (Experiment 1) and Clostridium perfringens-challenged (Experiment 2) conditions. The treatments in Experiment 1 were as follows: (i) CON (no probiotic additive), (ii) One-strain Pro (supplemented with Bacillus licheniformis) or (iii) Multi-strain Pro (supplemented with a multistrain Bacillus-based probiotic). The treatment groups in Experiment 2 received the same diets as those in Experiment 1 but were subjected to C. perfringens challenge. Both experiments lasted 35 days. Both products marginally affected broiler performance in the optimal or challenge conditions. In Experiment 1, Multi-strain Pro upregulated the mRNA expression level of 11 out of 15 selected genes, whereas in Experiment 2, this was less evident, and One-strain Pro was more effective. The multistrain probiotic was effective in maintaining gut morphostructure indices and increasing gut wall thickness, which was particularly evident in challenged birds. Neither additive induced bacterial activity (assessed by measuring enzymatic activity and short-chain fatty acid production) in the cecum, and Multi-strain Pro maintained the cecal butyrate concentration in challenged birds as in the challenged CON treatment, in which butyrate concentration was significantly higher than in the One-strain Pro treatment. Our findings indicated that the activity of these single- and multistrain probiotic products varies depending on rearing conditions, and the effect is highly strain- and product-specific. However, the multistrain probiotic apparently had more beneficial effects than the one-strain probiotic in the maintenance of gut functional status under optimal and challenge conditions.
食用形成孢子的基于芽孢杆菌的益生菌补充剂是改善肠道健康同时保持良好肉鸡性能的有效方法。本研究调查了两种益生菌产品在处于最佳条件(试验 1)和产气荚膜梭菌挑战条件(试验 2)的鸡中的潜力。试验 1 的处理如下:(i)CON(无益生菌添加剂)、(ii)单菌株 Pro(补充地衣芽孢杆菌)或(iii)多菌株 Pro(补充多菌株基于芽孢杆菌的益生菌)。试验 2 的处理组接受与试验 1 相同的饮食,但受到产气荚膜梭菌的挑战。两个试验均持续 35 天。这两种产品都对最佳或挑战条件下的肉鸡性能产生了轻微影响。在试验 1 中,多菌株 Pro 上调了 15 个选定基因中的 11 个基因的 mRNA 表达水平,而在试验 2 中,这一现象不太明显,单菌株 Pro 更为有效。多菌株益生菌在维持肠道形态结构指数和增加肠道壁厚度方面有效,在受到挑战的鸟类中尤为明显。两种添加剂都没有诱导盲肠中的细菌活性(通过测量酶活性和短链脂肪酸产生来评估),多菌株 Pro 维持了受挑战鸟类的盲肠丁酸浓度,与受挑战的 CON 处理中的丁酸浓度相同,其中单菌株 Pro 处理中的丁酸浓度明显更高。我们的研究结果表明,这些单一和多菌株益生菌产品的活性因饲养条件而异,且效果具有高度的菌株和产品特异性。然而,在维持最佳和挑战条件下的肠道功能状态方面,多菌株益生菌显然比单菌株益生菌具有更多的有益效果。