Suppr超能文献

医疗补助扩大计划是否缓解了乳房切除术后重建率的差异?

Did Medicaid Expansion Mitigate Disparities in Post-mastectomy Reconstruction Rates?

作者信息

Goldenberg Alison R, Willcox Lauren M, Abolghasemi Daria M, Jiang Renjian, Wei Zheng Z, Arciero Cletus A, Subhedar Preeti D

机构信息

161547Novant Health UVA Health System Prince William Medical Center, Haymarket, VA, USA.

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, 1371Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2022 May;88(5):846-851. doi: 10.1177/00031348211060452. Epub 2022 Jan 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and socioeconomic factors both contribute to disparities in post-mastectomy reconstruction (PMR) rates. We sought to explore PMR patterns across the US and to determine if PMR rates were associated with Medicaid expansion.

METHODS

The NCDB was used to identify women who underwent PMR between 2004-2016. The data was stratified by race, state Medicaid expansion status, and region. A multivariate model was fit to determine the association between Medicaid expansion and receipt of PMR.

RESULTS

In comparison to Caucasian women receiving PMR in Medicaid expansion states, African American (AA) women in Medicaid expansion states were less likely to receive PMR (OR .96 [.92-1.00] < .001). Patients in the Northeast (NE) had better PMR rates vs any other region in the US, for both Caucasian and AA women (Caucasian NE ref, Caucasian-South .80 [.77-.83] vs AA NE 1.11 [1.04-1.19], AA-South (.60 [.58-.63], < .001). Interestingly, AA patients residing in the NE had the highest receipt of PMR 1.11 (1.04-1.19), even higher than their Caucasian counterparts residing in the same region (ref). Rural AA women had the lowest rates of PMR vs rural Caucasian women (.40 [.28-.58] vs .79 [.73-.85], < .001].

DISCUSSION

Racial disparities in PMR rates persisted despite Medicaid expansion. When stratified by region, however, AA patients in the NE had higher rates of PMR than AA women in other regions. The largest disparities were seen in AA women in the rural US. Breast cancer disparities continue to be a complex problem that was not entirely mitigated by improved insurance coverage.

摘要

背景

患者因素和社会经济因素均导致乳房切除术后重建(PMR)率存在差异。我们试图探究美国各地的PMR模式,并确定PMR率是否与医疗补助扩大相关。

方法

利用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)识别2004年至2016年间接受PMR的女性。数据按种族、州医疗补助扩大状况和地区进行分层。采用多变量模型来确定医疗补助扩大与接受PMR之间的关联。

结果

与在医疗补助扩大州接受PMR的白人女性相比,医疗补助扩大州的非裔美国(AA)女性接受PMR的可能性较小(比值比0.96 [0.92 - 1.00],P <.001)。对于白人和AA女性,美国东北部(NE)的患者PMR率高于美国其他任何地区(白人NE为参照,白人 - 南部为0.80 [0.77 - 0.83],而AA NE为1.11 [1.04 - 1.19],AA - 南部为0.60 [0.58 - 0.63],P <.001)。有趣的是,居住在NE的AA患者接受PMR的比例最高,为1.11(1.04 - 1.19),甚至高于居住在同一地区的白人患者(参照)。与农村白人女性相比,农村AA女性的PMR率最低(0.40 [0.28 - 0.58] 对0.79 [0.73 - 0.85],P <.001)。

讨论

尽管医疗补助有所扩大,但PMR率的种族差异依然存在。然而,按地区分层时,NE的AA患者的PMR率高于其他地区的AA女性。美国农村地区的AA女性差异最为明显。乳腺癌差异仍然是一个复杂的问题,保险覆盖范围的改善并未完全缓解这一问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验