Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Zwolle, Isala, the Netherlands; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Breda, Amphia, the Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Zwolle, Isala, the Netherlands.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1610-1616. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.112. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
To date, both one- and two-stage techniques are used in immediate 'implant-based breast reconstruction' (IBBR) after mastectomy. Because it is still unknown what technique offers the best clinical outcomes, a multicenter retrospective study was conducted to compare both breast reconstruction techniques.
All patients, who underwent a mastectomy followed by immediate one- or two-stage IBBR during 2010 - 2016 were included. Our primary outcome measure was explantation of the 'tissue expander' (TE) and/ or implants within 60 days after breast reconstruction. Secondary outcomes were overall complication rate and secondary corrections.
Among a total of 383 women, TE/ implant explantation rate was higher in one-stage (19.9%) than in two-stage (11.3%) treated patients (p = 0.082). Overall complication rate (35.7% and 19.9% respectively, p = 0.008) and secondary corrections (29.8% and 20.3% respectively, p = 0.156) were also higher in one-stage compared to two-stage IBBR respectively. However, explantation (OR = 1.55; 95%CI = 0.67-3.58, p = 0.301) and complication (OR = 1.85; 95%CI = 0.92-3.37, p = 0.084) rates were comparable in one- and two-stage IBBR in our stratified multivariate logistic regression analyses, when controlling for history of smoking, nipple-sparing mastectomy, neoadjuvant radiation therapy, and removed breast tissue weight. A remarkable outcome in this study is that women treated with prophylactic surgery were more likely to have an explantation of the TE/ implant after a one-stage IBBR (OR = 4.49; 95%CI = 1.10-18.3, p = 0.037) than two-stage IBBR. In contrast, no association between type of IBBR and risk of TE/implants removal was found among women with a therapeutic mastectomy (OR = 0.82; 95%CI = 0.24-2.79, p = = 0.74).
One- and two-stage IBBR showed a comparable explantation and complication rate in our retrospective study. In one-stage IBBR more secondary corrections were detected. In addition, women who have to decide on a prophylactic mastectomy should be aware of a significantly higher risk of explantation of their implant after one-stage IBBR.
目前,在乳房切除术之后的即刻“基于植入物的乳房重建”(IBBR)中,既可以使用单阶段技术,也可以使用两阶段技术。由于尚不清楚哪种技术提供最佳的临床结果,因此进行了一项多中心回顾性研究,以比较两种乳房重建技术。
所有在 2010 年至 2016 年期间接受乳房切除术并随后即刻进行单阶段或两阶段 IBBR 的患者均被纳入研究。我们的主要结局测量指标是乳房重建后 60 天内“组织扩张器”(TE)和/或植入物的取出。次要结局是总并发症发生率和二次矫正。
在总共 383 名女性中,单阶段治疗组(19.9%)的 TE/植入物取出率高于两阶段治疗组(11.3%)(p=0.082)。总体并发症发生率(分别为 35.7%和 19.9%,p=0.008)和二次矫正率(分别为 29.8%和 20.3%,p=0.156)在单阶段 IBBR 中也高于两阶段 IBBR。然而,在我们的分层多变量逻辑回归分析中,当控制吸烟史、保留乳头的乳房切除术、新辅助放疗和切除的乳房组织重量时,单阶段和两阶段 IBBR 的 TE/植入物取出率(OR=1.55;95%CI=0.67-3.58,p=0.301)和并发症率(OR=1.85;95%CI=0.92-3.37,p=0.084)相当。本研究的一个显著结果是,预防性乳房切除术的女性在接受单阶段 IBBR 后,TE/植入物取出的可能性高于两阶段 IBBR(OR=4.49;95%CI=1.10-18.3,p=0.037)。相比之下,在接受治疗性乳房切除术的女性中,IBBR 类型与 TE/植入物取出的风险之间没有关联(OR=0.82;95%CI=0.24-2.79,p=0.74)。
在我们的回顾性研究中,单阶段和两阶段 IBBR 的 TE/植入物取出率和并发症发生率相当。在单阶段 IBBR 中,检测到更多的二次矫正。此外,决定进行预防性乳房切除术的女性应意识到,在单阶段 IBBR 后,其植入物取出的风险显著增加。