School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(19):28769-28787. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17156-4. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Based on the concept of strong sustainability, this paper builds a dynamic evaluation system on ecological environment quality from the concepts of ecological environment pollution and ecological environment management and puts forward the evaluation indexes including ecological environment pollution index (EPI), ecological environment management index (EMI), and ecological environment quality index (EQI). On this basis, kernel density estimation, Markov chain, Theil index, and dynamic SDM are used to reveal and explain the spatio-temporal evolution of ecological environment quality in China. The results were as follows. Overall, the EPI is decreasing while EMI and EQI are on the rise. In the long run, there is low possibility of upward and cross-level transition for EPI and EQI. The differences of EPI, EMI, and EQI are mainly caused by the regional differences. The regional differences have been reflected in the value of EPI, EMI, and EQI. It has been shown that the internal regional differences are continuously narrowing and the inter-regional differences are expanding. The convergence speeds of EPI, EMI, and EQI are 13.77%, 23.80%, and 9.69%, respectively. In the regional convergence test, different regions have shown different convergence speeds.
基于强可持续性的概念,本文从生态环境污染和生态环境管理的概念出发,构建了一个生态环境质量的动态评价体系,并提出了包括生态环境污染指数(EPI)、生态环境管理指数(EMI)和生态环境质量指数(EQI)在内的评价指标。在此基础上,运用核密度估计、马尔可夫链、泰尔指数和动态 SDM 揭示和解释了中国生态环境质量的时空演变。结果表明:EPI 呈下降趋势,而 EMI 和 EQI 呈上升趋势。从长期来看,EPI 和 EQI 向上和跨层次转变的可能性较低。EPI、EMI 和 EQI 的差异主要是由区域差异造成的。区域差异体现在 EPI、EMI 和 EQI 的数值上。研究表明,内部区域差异在不断缩小,而区域间差异在扩大。EPI、EMI 和 EQI 的收敛速度分别为 13.77%、23.80%和 9.69%。在区域收敛检验中,不同地区表现出不同的收敛速度。