James Gail, Kidd Katherine, Cooley Sam J, Fenton Kelly
Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:769590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769590. eCollection 2021.
Few studies have explored outdoor therapy when facilitated by clinical psychologists within an inpatient mental health service. In the present study, outdoor psychology sessions were introduced after service users (SUs) expressed a desire to return to face-to-face working during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to explore SUs' and clinical psychologists' perspectives on the feasibility of conducting outdoor therapy within the service. A mixed-method approach was underpinned by critical realist philosophy. Three psychologists maintained reflective diaries following outdoor therapy sessions with 16 SUs. A subsample of 14 SUs completed scales measuring therapeutic alliance and comfort during outdoor sessions. A subsample of eight SUs participated in semi-structured interviews. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Quantitative and qualitative data demonstrated high SU satisfaction with therapeutic alliance and comfort outdoors. Six themes were identified: utilising a person-centred approach; the value of multi-disciplinary team support; enhancing therapeutic engagement; the benefits of time away from the ward; managing confidentiality; physical health and safety. This feasibility study demonstrated the introduction of outdoor psychology sessions within an inpatient mental health service to be a viable response to COVID-19. The findings suggest outdoor therapy can be an effective and safe mode of therapy, and can offset the challenges of indoor working, providing certain risk factors are considered and managed. The limitations of this study and implications for clinical practice are discussed. Further research is now required to support future integration into clinical practice.
很少有研究探讨在住院心理健康服务中由临床心理学家提供的户外治疗。在本研究中,在服务使用者(SU)表示希望在新冠疫情期间恢复面对面工作后,引入了户外心理治疗课程。本研究旨在探讨服务使用者和临床心理学家对在该服务中开展户外治疗可行性的看法。一种混合方法以批判实在论哲学为基础。三位心理学家在与16名服务使用者进行户外治疗课程后撰写反思日记。14名服务使用者的子样本完成了测量户外治疗期间治疗联盟和舒适度的量表。8名服务使用者的子样本参与了半结构化访谈。使用描述性统计和主题分析对数据进行分析。定量和定性数据表明服务使用者对户外治疗联盟和舒适度高度满意。确定了六个主题:采用以人为本的方法;多学科团队支持的价值;增强治疗参与度;离开病房的好处;管理保密性;身体健康和安全。这项可行性研究表明,在住院心理健康服务中引入户外心理治疗课程是对新冠疫情的一种可行应对措施。研究结果表明,户外治疗可以是一种有效且安全的治疗方式,并且可以抵消室内工作的挑战,前提是要考虑并管理某些风险因素。讨论了本研究的局限性以及对临床实践的影响。现在需要进一步研究以支持未来将其整合到临床实践中。