Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Centre for Reproductive Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
J Glob Health. 2021 Dec 30;11:04050. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04050. eCollection 2021.
Reducing preterm birth and stillbirth and improving outcomes for babies born too soon is essential to reduce under-5 mortality globally. In the context of a rapidly evolving evidence base and problems with extrapolating efficacy data from high- to low-income settings, an assessment of the evidence for maternal and newborn interventions specific to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is required.
A systematic review of the literature was done. We included all studies performed in LMICs since the Every Newborn Action Plan, between 2013 - 2018, which reported on interventions where the outcome assessed was reduction in preterm birth or stillbirth incidence and/or a reduction in preterm infant neonatal mortality. Evidence was categorised according to maternal or neonatal intervention groups and a narrative synthesis conducted.
179 studies (147 primary evidence studies and 32 systematic reviews) were identified in 82 LMICs. 81 studies reported on maternal interventions and 98 reported on neonatal interventions. Interventions in pregnant mothers which resulted in significant reductions in preterm birth and stillbirth were (i) multiple micronutrient supplementation and (ii) enhanced quality of antenatal care. Routine antenatal ultrasound in LMICs increased identification of fetal antenatal conditions but did not reduce stillbirth or preterm birth due to the absence of services to manage these diagnoses. Interventions in pre-term neonates which improved their survival included (i) feeding support including probiotics and (ii) thermal regulation. Improved provision of neonatal resuscitation did not improve pre-term mortality rates, highlighting the importance of post-resuscitation care. Community mobilisation, for example through community education packages, was found to be an effective way of delivering interventions.
Evidence supports the implementation of several low-cost interventions with the potential to deliver reductions in preterm birth and stillbirth and improve outcomes for preterm babies in LMICs. These, however, must be complemented by overall health systems strengthening to be effective. Quality improvement methodology and learning health systems approaches can provide important means of understanding and tackling implementation challenges within local contexts. Further pragmatic efficacy trials of interventions in LMICs are essential, particularly for interventions not previously tested in these contexts.
降低早产和死产率,改善早产儿的结局,对于降低全球 5 岁以下儿童死亡率至关重要。在证据基础快速发展的背景下,以及将高收入国家的疗效数据外推到低收入国家存在问题,需要对特定于中低收入国家(LMICs)的孕产妇和新生儿干预措施进行证据评估。
对文献进行了系统评价。我们纳入了自《每个新生儿行动计划》以来在 LMICs 进行的所有研究,时间为 2013 年至 2018 年,这些研究报告了评估干预措施减少早产或死产发生率和/或降低早产儿新生儿死亡率的结果。根据孕产妇或新生儿干预组对证据进行分类,并进行叙述性综合分析。
在 82 个 LMICs 中确定了 179 项研究(147 项原始证据研究和 32 项系统评价)。81 项研究报告了孕产妇干预措施,98 项报告了新生儿干预措施。对母亲进行干预,可显著降低早产和死产率,包括(i)多种微量营养素补充,(ii)强化产前保健质量。在 LMICs 中常规进行产前超声检查可以增加对胎儿产前情况的识别,但由于缺乏管理这些诊断的服务,并没有减少死产或早产率。对早产儿进行干预,包括(i)喂养支持,包括益生菌,(ii)体温调节,可以提高其存活率。提高新生儿复苏的提供并没有降低早产儿死亡率,这突显了复苏后护理的重要性。例如,通过社区教育包进行社区动员,被发现是一种有效的干预措施提供方式。
有证据支持实施几种低成本干预措施,这些措施有可能降低早产和死产率,并改善 LMICs 中早产儿的结局。然而,这些措施必须辅以整体卫生系统的加强,才能发挥作用。质量改进方法和学习型卫生系统方法可以为了解和解决当地实施挑战提供重要手段。在 LMICs 中进一步进行干预措施的实用性疗效试验至关重要,特别是对于这些情况下尚未经过测试的干预措施。