Cho Sung-Hyun, Lee Hyo-Jin, Aldhafian Osama R, Kim Yang-Soo
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 4;10(1):23259671211063922. doi: 10.1177/23259671211063922. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is an established procedure for cuff tear arthropathy. More lateralized prostheses have been designed to overcome the reported adverse outcomes of Grammont-style rTSA.
To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medialized and lateralized center of rotation (COR) in rTSA.
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.
This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included were studies with a level of evidence ≥3 that compared medialized and lateralized rTSA with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Functional scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Constant score (CSS), range of motion at final follow-up, gain of external rotation (ER), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, scapular notching, and heterotopic ossification (HO) were compared. Data were analyzed using random-effects or fixed-effects models in accordance with heterogeneity.
Five retrospective cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled study (n = 594 patients) were included. Lateralized rTSA resulted in greater improvement in ER degree ( < .001), a lower VAS pain score (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.39; = .002), and a lower rate of scapular notching (risk ratio [RR], 0.40; < .001) and HO (RR, 0.52; < .001). Final forward flexion (SMD, -0.14; = .629) and ER (SMD, 0.21; = .238) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Overall functional scores, including ASES score (SMD, 0.22; = .310) and CSS (SMD, 0.37; = .077), also did not differ significantly (SMD, 0.28; = .062). The overall complication rate did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (RR, 0.71; = .339).
Compared with medialized rTSA, lateralized COR rTSA results in greater improvement in ER and the VAS pain score, decreased rates of scapular notching and HO, and no significant changes in functional outcome scores or the complication rate.
反式全肩关节置换术(rTSA)是治疗肩袖撕裂性关节病的既定术式。已设计出更偏外侧的假体以克服Grammont式rTSA报道的不良后果。
比较rTSA中旋转中心(COR)偏内侧和偏外侧的临床及影像学结果。
系统评价;证据等级,3级。
本评价遵循PRISMA(系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目)指南。纳入证据等级≥3级、比较偏内侧和偏外侧rTSA且随访至少12个月的研究。比较功能评分,包括美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分和常数评分(CSS)、末次随访时的活动范围、外旋(ER)增加量、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、肩胛切迹及异位骨化(HO)情况。根据异质性采用随机效应或固定效应模型分析数据。
纳入5项回顾性队列研究和1项随机对照研究(n = 594例患者)。偏外侧rTSA在外旋度数改善方面更显著(P <.001),VAS疼痛评分更低(标准化均数差[SMD],-0.39;P =.002),肩胛切迹发生率更低(风险比[RR],0.40;P <.001)以及HO发生率更低(RR,0.52;P <.001)。两组间最终前屈(SMD,-0.14;P =.629)和外旋(SMD,0.21;P =.238)无显著差异。包括ASES评分(SMD,0.22;P =.310)和CSS(SMD,0.37;P =.077)在内的总体功能评分也无显著差异(SMD,0.28;P =.062)。两组间总体并发症发生率无显著差异(RR,0.71;P =.339)。
与偏内侧rTSA相比,偏外侧COR的rTSA在外旋和VAS疼痛评分方面改善更显著,肩胛切迹和HO发生率降低,功能结局评分及并发症发生率无显著变化。