Suppr超能文献

动学对线匹配功能对线可获得延长间隙:749 例初次内侧骨关节炎膝关节应力位 X 线片的连续分析。

Kinematic alignment matches functional alignment for the extension gap: a consecutive analysis of 749 primary varus osteoarthritic knees with stress radiographs.

机构信息

Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, 103 Grande rue de la Croix Rousse, Hopital de La Croix Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France.

Univ Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, F69622, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Sep;30(9):2915-2921. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06832-0. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The alignment goal in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains debated. Two major strategies have emerged based on recreating the native knee: kinematic and functional alignment (KA and FA). Recently a new Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification for KA, based on bony landmarks, was described considering joint line obliquity and the arithmetic HipKneeAnkle angle (aHKA). Valgus corrected HKA medial angle (vcHKA) was measured on distractive valgus preoperative radiographs compensating for cartilage wear and ligament balance in varus osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to determine if aHKA accounts for differences in medial laxity for the extension gap by comparing vcHKA to aHKA. The hypothesis was that no significant difference would be observed between the two measurements.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 749 knees in consecutive patients presenting to a single-centre with primary medial osteoarthritis. Patients underwent standardized weight bearing long-leg and valgus stress radiographs. Tibial mechanical angle (TMA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and vcHKA were measured using digital software. aHKA and vcHKA were compared to determine differences due to soft tissue balancing.

RESULTS

The mean FMA was 91.3 ± 2.2° (range 82°-97°), the mean TMA was 85.7 ± 2.5° (range 75°-98°), the mean aHKA was 177.0 ± 3.0° (range 164°-185°) and the mean vcHKA was 176.6 ± 3.1° (range 165°-192°). No significant difference was observed between aHKA and vcHKA (p = 0.06). A significant correlation was found between vcHKA and TMA (ρ = 0.3; p < 0.001) and between vcHKA and FMA (ρ = 0.41; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that vcHKA was similar to aHKA confirming that aHKA accounts for ligamentous medial laxity. Therefore, kinematic alignment based on the CPAK classification matches the pre-arthritic coronal alignment of the knee for the extension gap.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

目的

全膝关节置换术(TKA)的对线目标仍存在争议。基于重建自然膝关节,已经出现了两种主要策略:运动学和功能对线(KA 和 FA)。最近,一种新的基于骨性标志的冠状面膝关节对线(CPAK)KA 分类方法被描述出来,该方法考虑了关节线倾斜和算术髋膝踝角(aHKA)。在 Distractive Valgus 术前 X 光片上测量矫正后内侧角(vcHKA),以补偿内侧关节炎的软骨磨损和韧带平衡。本研究的目的是通过比较 vcHKA 和 aHKA 来确定 aHKA 是否可以解释伸展间隙内侧松弛度的差异。假设这两种测量方法之间不会观察到显著差异。

方法

这是对在单中心因原发性内侧骨关节炎就诊的连续患者的 749 例膝关节进行的回顾性分析。患者接受了标准化负重全长和外翻位应力 X 光检查。使用数字软件测量胫骨机械角(TMA)、股骨机械角(FMA)和 vcHKA。比较 aHKA 和 vcHKA 以确定软组织平衡引起的差异。

结果

平均 FMA 为 91.3±2.2°(范围 82°-97°),平均 TMA 为 85.7±2.5°(范围 75°-98°),平均 aHKA 为 177.0±3.0°(范围 164°-185°),平均 vcHKA 为 176.6±3.1°(范围 165°-192°)。aHKA 和 vcHKA 之间无显著差异(p=0.06)。发现 vcHKA 与 TMA 之间存在显著相关性(ρ=0.3;p<0.001),vcHKA 与 FMA 之间存在显著相关性(ρ=0.41;p<0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,vcHKA 与 aHKA 相似,证实 aHKA 可以解释韧带的内侧松弛度。因此,基于 CPAK 分类的运动对线与膝关节伸展间隙的前关节炎冠状对线相匹配。

证据水平

IV 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验