Suppr超能文献

秋水仙碱用于冠心病二级预防的Meta 分析:随机对照试验研究。

Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and The Second People's Hospital of Huai'an, Huai'an, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2022 May;31(5):685-695. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.09.017. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colchicine has become prominent as an anti-inflammatory therapy for secondary cardiovascular prevention in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine in patients with CAD.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) between patients with CAD randomised to colchicine versus placebo (or no colchicine) were included. Random effect risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 12,071 patients in seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo or no colchicine, colchicine was associated with a significantly lower incidence of MACEs (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.80, p<0.01). The reduction in MACEs in the colchicine group was driven by statistically significant reductions in the incidence of myocardial ischaemia (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.95, p=0.02), coronary revascularisation (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.89, p=0.01), and stroke (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.83, p=0.01). However, there was no statistically significant difference for cardiovascular death (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.55-1.22, p=0.33). All-cause and non-cardiovascular mortality, gastrointestinal events, infection, and cancer were not significantly different between the colchicine and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Colchicine is a reasonably efficacious and safe drug that could be successfully utilised for the secondary prevention of CAD.

摘要

背景

秋水仙碱已成为冠心病(CAD)二级心血管预防治疗的一种重要抗炎疗法。本荟萃分析旨在评估 CAD 患者使用秋水仙碱的疗效和安全性。

方法

纳入比较 CAD 患者随机分配至秋水仙碱组与安慰剂(或无秋水仙碱)组之间主要不良心血管事件(MACEs)的随机对照试验(RCTs)。计算临床结局的随机效应风险比(RR)。

结果

共有 7 项 RCT 的 12071 例患者纳入荟萃分析。与安慰剂或无秋水仙碱相比,秋水仙碱可显著降低 MACEs 的发生率(RR 0.64,95%CI 0.51-0.80,p<0.01)。秋水仙碱组 MACEs 的减少归因于心肌缺血(RR 0.74,95%CI 0.58-0.95,p=0.02)、冠状动脉血运重建(RR 0.61,95%CI 0.42-0.89,p=0.01)和中风(RR 0.48,95%CI 0.28-0.83,p=0.01)发生率的统计学显著降低。然而,心血管死亡(RR 0.82,95%CI 0.55-1.22,p=0.33)无统计学显著差异。秋水仙碱组和对照组的全因和非心血管死亡率、胃肠道事件、感染和癌症发生率无显著差异。

结论

秋水仙碱是一种合理有效且安全的药物,可成功用于 CAD 的二级预防。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验