Suppr超能文献

异物导致食管穿孔的非手术治疗的安全性和疗效。

Safety and Efficacy of Nonoperative Treatment in Esophageal Perforation Caused by Foreign Bodies.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Human Genetic Resources Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 19;13(1):e00451. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000451.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal foreign bodies are often treated by endoscopy, but the treatment of esophageal perforation caused by foreign bodies remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of nonoperative treatment of esophageal perforation caused by foreign bodies.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 270 patients admitted to our hospital for esophageal perforation caused by foreign bodies from January 2012 to December 2020, all of whom received nonoperative treatment.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 56 ± 17 years, and fish bones were the most common type of foreign body. A total of 61.2% of the perforations were in the cervical esophagus. All patients received nonoperative treatment initially, and the foreign body removal rate using endoscopy reached 97%. The perforation healing rate reached 94.8%, whereas 3 patients (1.1%) died during hospitalization. The median (range) duration of hospitalization was 4 days (3-6). Multivariable analysis showed age ≥ 66 years (odds ratio [OR]: 2.196; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.232-3.916; P = 0.008), men (OR: 1.934; 95% CI: 1.152-3.246; P = 0.013), and time to treatment (OR: 1.126; 95% CI: 1.027-1.233; P = 0.011) were independent risk factors for infection, whereas the risk of infection was lower when the foreign body type was fish bone (OR: 0.557; 95% CI: 0.330-0.940; P = 0.028).

DISCUSSION

Nonoperative treatment is safe and effective for esophageal perforation caused by foreign bodies. Even if perforation is combined with infection, active nonoperative treatment can still achieve a good effect. Early intervention can effectively reduce the risk of infection and improve patient outcomes.

摘要

引言

食管异物常通过内镜治疗,但异物引起的食管穿孔的治疗仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨非手术治疗食管异物穿孔的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月我院收治的 270 例食管异物穿孔患者,均行非手术治疗。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 56 ± 17 岁,鱼骨是最常见的异物类型。共有 61.2%的穿孔发生在颈段食管。所有患者最初均行非手术治疗,内镜下异物取出率达 97%。穿孔愈合率达 94.8%,但有 3 例(1.1%)患者在住院期间死亡。中位(范围)住院时间为 4 天(3-6 天)。多变量分析显示年龄≥66 岁(比值比[OR]:2.196;95%置信区间[CI]:1.232-3.916;P=0.008)、男性(OR:1.934;95%CI:1.152-3.246;P=0.013)和治疗时间(OR:1.126;95%CI:1.027-1.233;P=0.011)是感染的独立危险因素,而异物类型为鱼骨时感染风险较低(OR:0.557;95%CI:0.330-0.940;P=0.028)。

讨论

非手术治疗食管异物穿孔是安全有效的。即使穿孔合并感染,积极的非手术治疗仍能取得良好效果。早期干预可有效降低感染风险,改善患者预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a4/8806378/d6a72f4b9a45/ct9-13-e00451-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验