Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262421. eCollection 2022.
This qualitative study explores the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), including social distancing, travel restrictions and quarantine, on lived experiences during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand (TH), Malaysia (MY), Italy (IT) and the United Kingdom (UK). A total of 86 interviews (TH: n = 28; MY: n = 18; IT: n = 20; UK: n = 20) were conducted with members of the public, including healthcare workers (n = 13). Participants across countries held strong views on government imposed NPIs, with many feeling measures lacked clarity. Most participants reported primarily negative impacts of NPIs on their lives, including through separation, isolation and grief over missed milestones; work-related challenges and income loss; and poor mental health and wellbeing. Nonetheless, many also experienced inadvertent positive consequences, including more time at home to focus on what they most valued in life; a greater sense of connectedness; and benefits to working life. Commonly employed coping strategies focused on financial coping (e.g. reducing spending); psycho-emotional coping (e.g. engaging in spiritual practices); social coping and connectedness (e.g., maintaining relationships remotely); reducing and mitigating risks (e.g., changing food shopping routines); and limiting exposure to the news (e.g., checking news only occasionally). Importantly, the extent to which participants' lived experiences were positive or negative, and their ability to cope was underpinned by individual, social and economic factors, with the analysis indicating some salient differences across countries and participants. In order to mitigate negative and unequal impacts of NPIs, COVID-19 policies will benefit from paying closer attention to the social, cultural and psychological-not just biological-vulnerabilities to, and consequences of public health measures.
本定性研究探讨了非药物干预措施(NPIs),包括社交距离、旅行限制和检疫,对泰国(TH)、马来西亚(MY)、意大利(IT)和英国(UK)第一波 COVID-19 大流行期间生活体验的影响。共对 86 名公众(包括医护人员)进行了 28 名泰国人、18 名马来西亚人、20 名意大利人和 20 名英国人的访谈。各国参与者对政府实施的 NPIs 持有强烈观点,许多人认为措施缺乏明确性。大多数参与者报告 NPIs 对他们的生活产生了主要负面影响,包括因错过里程碑而产生的分离、隔离和悲伤;与工作相关的挑战和收入损失;以及心理健康和幸福感差。尽管如此,许多人也经历了意想不到的积极后果,包括在家中更多的时间专注于生活中最珍视的东西;更强的联系感;以及对工作生活的好处。常用的应对策略侧重于财务应对(例如减少支出);心理情绪应对(例如从事精神实践);社会应对和联系(例如,远程维持关系);减少和减轻风险(例如,改变食品购物习惯);以及限制接触新闻(例如,偶尔查看新闻)。重要的是,参与者的生活体验是积极还是消极,以及他们的应对能力,都受到个人、社会和经济因素的影响,分析表明各国和参与者之间存在一些明显的差异。为了减轻 NPIs 的负面和不平等影响,COVID-19 政策将受益于更加关注公共卫生措施的社会、文化和心理脆弱性,而不仅仅是生物脆弱性,以及这些措施的后果。