De Sadeleer Laurens J, Verleden Stijn E, Schupp Jonas C, McDonough John E, Goos Tinne, Yserbyt Jonas, Bargagli Elena, Rottoli Paola, Kaminski Naftali, Prasse Antje, Wuyts Wim A
Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department CHROMETA, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Unit of Interstitial Lung Diseases, Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department CHROMETA, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1576-1588. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.12.668. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
Given the plethora of pathophysiologic mechanisms described in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), we hypothesize that the mechanisms driving fibrosis in IPF may be different from one patient to another.
Do IPF endotypes exist and are they associated with outcome?
Using a publicly available gene expression dataset retrieved from BAL samples of patients with IPF and control participants (GSE70867), we clustered IPF samples based on a dimension reduction algorithm specifically designed for -omics data, called DDR Tree. After clustering, gene set enrichment analysis was performed for functional annotation, associations with clinical variables and prognosis were investigated, and differences in transcriptional regulation were determined using motif enrichment analysis. The findings were validated in three independent publicly available gene expression datasets retrieved from IPF blood samples.
One hundred seventy-six IPF samples from three centers were clustered in six IPF clusters, with distinct functional enrichment. Although clinical characteristics did not differ between the clusters, one cluster conferred worse sex-age-physiology score-corrected survival, whereas another showed a numeric trend toward worse survival (P = .08). The first was enriched for increased epithelial and innate and adaptive immunity signatures, whereas the other showed important telomere and mitochondrial dysfunction, loss of proteostasis, and increased myofibroblast signatures. The existence of these two endotypes, including the impact on survival of the immune endotype, was validated in three independent validation cohorts. Finally, we identified transcription factors regulating the expression of endotype-specific survival-associated genes.
Gene expression-based endotyping in IPF is feasible and can inform clinical evolution. As endotype-specific pathways and survival-associated transcription factors are identified, endotyping may open up the possibility of endotype-tailored therapy.
鉴于特发性肺纤维化(IPF)中描述的众多病理生理机制,我们推测驱动IPF纤维化的机制可能因患者而异。
IPF内型是否存在,它们与预后相关吗?
利用从IPF患者和对照参与者的支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)样本中检索到的公开可用基因表达数据集(GSE70867),我们基于一种专门为组学数据设计的降维算法(称为DDR Tree)对IPF样本进行聚类。聚类后,进行基因集富集分析以进行功能注释,研究与临床变量和预后的关联,并使用基序富集分析确定转录调控的差异。这些发现在从IPF血液样本中检索到的三个独立公开可用基因表达数据集中得到验证。
来自三个中心的176个IPF样本被聚类为六个IPF簇,具有不同的功能富集。尽管各簇之间的临床特征没有差异,但一个簇的性别-年龄-生理评分校正生存率较差,而另一个簇则显示出生存率较差的数字趋势(P = 0.08)。第一个簇富集了上皮、固有和适应性免疫特征的增加,而另一个簇则显示出重要的端粒和线粒体功能障碍、蛋白质稳态丧失以及肌成纤维细胞特征增加。这两种内型的存在,包括免疫内型对生存的影响,在三个独立的验证队列中得到验证。最后,我们确定了调节内型特异性生存相关基因表达的转录因子。
基于基因表达的IPF内型分型是可行的,并且可以为临床进展提供信息。随着内型特异性途径和生存相关转录因子的确定,内型分型可能为内型定制治疗开辟可能性。