Mylène Aubertin-Leheudre, PhD, Département des sciences de l'activité physique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Pavillon des sciences biologiques, 141 avenue Président-Kennedy, SB-4615, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3P8. Email:
J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26(1):52-56. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1699-y.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face assessments were limited. Fortunately, older adults have access to web-technology (60%). Thus, we aimed to explore if assessing physical performance remotely is as reliable and valid as in person. At the end of the first lockdown, 15 older adults agreed to perform two similar evaluations in remote and face-to-face conditions. Functional capacities [5-repetitions Sit-to-Stand (STS); unipodal balance, 4-m walking speed (normal (NWS); fast (FWS)), 3-m Timed-Up and Go (normal (nTUG); fast (fTUG))] and muscle power and endurance were assessed. Fast walking speed was moderately reliable. Unipodal balance, NWS and nTUG were highly reliable (ICC>0.7). fTUG, STS, muscle endurance and power were extremely reliable (ICC>0.9). For absolute reliability, SEM varied from 15.54 to 5.14%. Finally, the MDC varied from 43.07 to 14.21%. Assessing functional capacities and muscle function remotely is as reliable and valid as a face-to-face assessment and should be considered as a clinical practice.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,面对面评估受到限制。幸运的是,老年人可以使用网络技术(60%)。因此,我们旨在探索远程评估身体表现是否与面对面评估一样可靠和有效。在第一次封锁结束时,15 名老年人同意在远程和面对面条件下进行两次相似的评估。评估了功能能力[5 次重复坐站(STS);单足平衡,4 米步行速度(正常(NWS);快速(FWS)),3 米计时起立行走(正常(nTUG);快速(fTUG))]和肌肉力量和耐力。快速步行速度具有中等可靠性。单足平衡、NWS 和 nTUG 具有高度可靠性(ICC>0.7)。fTUG、STS、肌肉耐力和力量具有极高的可靠性(ICC>0.9)。对于绝对可靠性,SEM 从 15.54 到 5.14%不等。最后,MDC 从 43.07 到 14.21%不等。远程评估功能能力和肌肉功能与面对面评估一样可靠和有效,应考虑作为临床实践。