Suppr超能文献

[一份用于评估谵妄知识的问卷的编制及内容效度]

[Development and content validity of a questionnaire to assess knowledge about delirium].

作者信息

Zilezinski Max, Lohrmann Renée, Hauß Armin, Bergjan Manuela

机构信息

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Geschäftsbereich Pflegedirektion - Pflegewissenschaft, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.

Universitätsmedizin Halle (Saale), AG Versorgungsforschung | Pflege im Krankenhaus, Department für Innere Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Mar;56(2):132-138. doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02015-9. Epub 2022 Jan 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome that can have serious consequences and is often overlooked by healthcare professionals. The level of knowledge about delirium is often insufficient among nursing and medical staff. At the current time there is no suitable questionnaire to record the level of knowledge in German-speaking countries.

AIM

Development of a questionnaire and evaluation of content validity.

METHODS

Following a literature search to identify current best practice, several questionnaires were identified. An already published questionnaire with the dimensions of basic knowledge of delirium and risk factors has been translated, adapted and extended by the dimension of nonpharmacological delirium prevention. Delirium experts assessed the relevance of the questionnaire items in two rounds of reviews. Content validity was calculated using the Content Validity Index (CVI) at item (I-CVI) and scale (S-CVI) level. Additionally, the modified Kappa (k*) was calculated using a lower 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The original 30-item questionnaire was expanded to include 18 delirium prevention items. After the first round of scoring 30 out of 48 items showed good to excellent I‑CVI scores. Considering the comments, 6 items were discarded and 12 were adapted in terms of language and content. In the final version of the questionnaire 41 items with excellent scores remained. The total scale score increased from 0.88 in the first version to 1.0 in the final version. Nurses were identified as the target group, potentially also therapists and medical personnel.

CONCLUSION

The delirium knowledge questionnaire is content-valid.

摘要

背景

谵妄是一种神经精神综合征,可能会产生严重后果,且常常被医护人员忽视。护理人员和医务人员对谵妄的了解程度往往不足。目前在德语国家没有合适的问卷来记录相关知识水平。

目的

开发一份问卷并评估其内容效度。

方法

在进行文献检索以确定当前最佳实践后,识别出了几份问卷。一份已发表的具有谵妄基础知识和危险因素维度的问卷已被翻译、改编,并增加了非药物性谵妄预防维度。谵妄专家在两轮评审中评估了问卷项目的相关性。使用内容效度指数(CVI)在项目(I-CVI)和量表(S-CVI)层面计算内容效度。此外,使用较低的95%置信区间(CI)计算修正卡帕(k*)。

结果

最初的30项问卷扩展为包括18项谵妄预防项目。第一轮评分后,48项中的30项显示出良好至优秀的I-CVI分数。考虑到反馈意见,6项被舍弃,12项在语言和内容方面进行了调整。问卷的最终版本保留了41项得分优秀的项目。量表总分从第一版的0.88提高到了最终版的1.0。确定护士为目标群体,治疗师和医务人员也可能适用。

结论

谵妄知识问卷具有内容效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d6f/10011321/3db7d365b449/391_2022_2015_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验