Zahran Shatha, Mannocci Francesco, Koller Garrit
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Endodontics, Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Endodontics, Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
J Endod. 2022 Apr;48(4):479-486. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
Asepsis in endodontics aims to control all potential sources of infection. Inadvertent introduction of bacteria into the root canal system may occur when the aseptic chain is breached during treatment. Therefore, measures are taken to prevent such microbial access and establish an aseptic environment. This study aimed to assess potential bacterial contamination and the potential risk of iatrogenic introduction from 7 sites comprising surfaces, instruments, and files acquired during the treatment of 30 vital, pulpitic teeth.
Bacterial samples were collected from access burs, files, endodontic rulers, rubber dam surfaces, gloves, and instruments. Genomic DNA was extracted and quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Bacterial types were determined using next-generation sequencing.
High frequencies of contamination and microbial numbers were encountered in all sample types examined.Thirty-eight percent of the initial files introduced into the root canal had significant levels of bacteria at the point of obturation, including endodontic pathogens. Around half of the rubber dam surfaces were contaminated with substantial bacterial loads at the time of obturation, and bacteria were also detected in 20%-30% of gloves, instruments, and rulers before obturation. Next-generation sequencing revealed the predominant oral or endodontic origin of these contaminants, with the following genera identified: Streptococcus, Rothia, Granulicatella, Cutibacterium, Corynebacterium, Peptostreptococcus, and Fusobacterium. Together, these findings highlight the potential risk of reintroducing endodontically relevant bacteria during treatment.
Gloves, rubber dams, instruments, and files acquire bacterial contamination during treatment at high frequencies and loads. This highlights the potential risk of iatrogenic contamination at the clinically vulnerable point of canal obturation. Measures to address these may improve clinical outcomes.
牙髓病学中的无菌操作旨在控制所有潜在的感染源。在治疗过程中,如果无菌操作链被打破,细菌可能会意外进入根管系统。因此,需要采取措施防止微生物进入并建立无菌环境。本研究旨在评估30颗活髓、牙髓炎患牙治疗过程中7个部位(包括表面、器械和锉)的潜在细菌污染情况以及医源性引入的潜在风险。
从开髓钻、锉、牙髓测量尺、橡皮障表面、手套和器械上采集细菌样本。提取基因组DNA并通过定量聚合酶链反应进行定量。使用下一代测序确定细菌类型。
在所有检测的样本类型中都发现了高频率的污染和微生物数量。在根管充填时,引入根管的初始锉中有38%含有大量细菌,包括牙髓病原体。约一半的橡皮障表面在充填时被大量细菌污染,在充填前,20%-30%的手套、器械和测量尺上也检测到了细菌。下一代测序显示这些污染物主要来源于口腔或牙髓,鉴定出的菌属如下:链球菌属、罗氏菌属、颗粒链菌属、丙酸杆菌属、棒状杆菌属、消化链球菌属和梭杆菌属。这些发现共同凸显了治疗过程中重新引入与牙髓相关细菌的潜在风险。
手套、橡皮障、器械和锉在治疗过程中极易受到细菌污染,且污染频率和负荷较高。这凸显了在根管充填这一临床易感染环节发生医源性污染的潜在风险。解决这些问题的措施可能会改善临床治疗效果。