Suppr超能文献

30 多年吸烟模式与听力障碍和噪声中言语感知的关系:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究。

Association of Cigarette Smoking Patterns Over 30 Years With Audiometric Hearing Impairment and Speech-in-Noise Perception: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

机构信息

Cochlear Center for Hearing and Public Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Mar 1;148(3):243-251. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.3982.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The implications of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation for hearing impairment remain unknown. Many studies on this topic have failed to account for attrition among smokers in their findings.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of cigarette smoking patterns with audiometric and speech-in-noise hearing measures among participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study included participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study from 4 US communities. The analysis includes data from visit 1 (1987-1989) through visit 6 (2016-2017); data were analyzed from March 16 through June 25, 2021. Audiometric hearing and speech-in-noise testing was offered to all participants at visit 6. Participants with incomplete audiometric data or missing data for educational level, body mass index, drinking status, a diabetes or hypertension diagnosis, or occupational noise were excluded. In addition, individuals were excluded if they self-reported as having other than Black or White race and ethnicity, or if they self-reported as having Black race or ethnicity and lived in 2 predominantly White communities.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Smoking behavior was classified from visit 1 (1987-1989) to visit 6 (2016-2017) using group-based trajectory modeling based on self-reported smoking status at each clinic visit. Hearing was assessed at visit 6. An audiometric 4-frequency (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) pure-tone average (PTA) was calculated for the better-hearing ear and modeled as a continuous variable. Speech-in-noise perception was assessed via the Quick Speech-in-Noise Test (QuickSIN) and modeled continuously. Attrition during the 30 years of follow-up was addressed by inverse probability of attrition weighting.

RESULTS

A total of 3414 participants aged 72 to 94 years (median [IQR] age, 78.8 [76.0-82.9] years; 2032 [59.5%] women) when hearing was measured at visit 6 (2016-2017) were included in the cohort; 766 (22.4%) self-identified as Black and 2648 (77.6%) as White individuals. Study participants were classified into 3 smoking groups based on smoking behavior: never or former smoking at baseline (n = 2911 [85.3%]), quit smoking during the study period (n = 368 [10.8%]), and persistent smoking (n = 135 [4.0%]). In fully adjusted models, persistent smoking vs never or former smoking was associated with an average 2.69 (95% CI, 0.56-4.81) dB higher PTA (worse hearing) and 1.42 (95% CI, -2.29 to -0.56) lower QuickSIN score (worse performance). Associations were stronger when accounting for informative attrition during the study period (3.53 [95% CI, 1.14-5.93] dB higher PTA; 1.46 [95% CI, -2.52 to -0.41] lower QuickSIN scores). Smoking cessation during the study (vs never or former smoking) was not associated with changes in hearing.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, persistent smoking was associated with worse audiometric hearing and speech-in-noise perception. Hearing measures among participants who quit smoking during the study period did not differ from those for never or former smokers, indicating that smoking cessation (as opposed to persistent smoking) may have benefits for hearing health.

摘要

重要性:吸烟和戒烟对听力损伤的影响仍不清楚。许多关于这个主题的研究未能在他们的发现中考虑到吸烟者的流失。

目的:评估动脉粥样硬化风险社区研究(Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study)参与者中吸烟模式与听力测量和噪声下言语感知之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项横断面研究,包括来自美国 4 个社区的动脉粥样硬化风险社区研究参与者。分析包括从第 1 次访视(1987-1989 年)到第 6 次访视(2016-2017 年)的数据;数据于 2021 年 3 月 16 日至 6 月 25 日进行分析。所有参与者在第 6 次访视时都接受了听力和噪声下言语测试。排除了听力数据不完整或缺少教育程度、体重指数、饮酒状况、糖尿病或高血压诊断或职业性噪声暴露数据的参与者。此外,如果参与者自我报告为非黑人和白人种族和民族,或者自我报告为黑人种族但居住在 2 个主要为白人的社区,则将其排除在外。

主要结果和措施:根据每次就诊时的自我报告吸烟状况,从第 1 次访视(1987-1989 年)到第 6 次访视(2016-2017 年)使用基于群组轨迹建模的方法对吸烟行为进行分类。在第 6 次访视时评估听力。较好耳的纯音平均听力(PTA)为 4 个频率(0.5、1、2、4 kHz),并将其建模为连续变量。通过快速噪声下言语测试(Quick Speech-in-Noise Test,QuickSIN)评估噪声下言语感知,并连续建模。通过反向概率失访加权解决 30 年随访期间的失访问题。

结果:在进行听力测量的第 6 次访视(2016-2017 年)时,共有 3414 名年龄在 72 至 94 岁之间的参与者(中位数[IQR]年龄为 78.8 [76.0-82.9]岁;2032 [59.5%]为女性)被纳入队列;766 名(22.4%)自我认定为黑人,2648 名(77.6%)为白人。根据吸烟行为,研究参与者被分为 3 个吸烟组:基线时从不或以前吸烟(n = 2911 [85.3%])、研究期间戒烟(n = 368 [10.8%])和持续吸烟(n = 135 [4.0%])。在完全调整的模型中,与从不或以前吸烟相比,持续吸烟与平均 2.69(95%CI,0.56-4.81)dB 的 PTA(听力更差)和 1.42(95%CI,-2.29 至-0.56)dB 的 QuickSIN 评分(言语感知更差)升高相关。当考虑到研究期间信息性失访时,相关性更强(PTA 升高 3.53 [95%CI,1.14-5.93]dB;QuickSIN 评分降低 1.46 [95%CI,-2.52 至-0.41])。与从不或以前吸烟相比,研究期间戒烟与听力变化无关。

结论和相关性:在这项横断面研究中,持续吸烟与更差的听力测量和噪声下言语感知有关。在研究期间戒烟的参与者的听力测量结果与从不或以前吸烟的参与者没有差异,这表明戒烟(而不是持续吸烟)可能对听力健康有益。

相似文献

2
Association of Carotid Atherosclerosis With Hearing Loss: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar 1;149(3):223-230. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4651.
5
Speech-in-Noise Assessment in the Routine Audiologic Test Battery: Relationship to Perceived Auditory Disability.
Ear Hear. 2024;45(4):816-826. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001472. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties Among Adults With Normal Audiograms: The Beaver Dam Offspring Study.
Ear Hear. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):e290-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000195.
10
Association of skin color, race/ethnicity, and hearing loss among adults in the USA.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb;13(1):109-17. doi: 10.1007/s10162-011-0298-8. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

2
Awareness of and the relationship between noise-induced hearing loss and the use of personal listening devices in Jazan region, Saudi Arabia.
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 21;13:1505442. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1505442. eCollection 2025.
3
Age-Related Hearing Loss: A Cross-Sectional Study of Healthy Older Australians.
Gerontology. 2024 Nov 21;71(2):1-12. doi: 10.1159/000541895.
4
Low-Dose Aspirin and Progression of Age-Related Hearing Loss: A Secondary Analysis of the ASPREE Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24373.
7
[The professional ear user-implications for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ear diseases].
HNO. 2022 Dec;70(12):891-902. doi: 10.1007/s00106-022-01235-0. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission.
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
2
Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 13;17(4):1201. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041201.
3
Relationship of Cigarette Smoking and Time of Quitting with Incident Dementia and Cognitive Decline.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):337-345. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16228. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
4
Otitis media with effusion in children: Cross-frequency correlation in pure tone audiometry.
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221405. eCollection 2019.
6
Protection and Prevention of Age-Related Hearing Loss.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1130:59-71. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-6123-4_4.
7
Progression of Hearing Loss in the Aging Population: Repeated Auditory Measurements in the Rotterdam Study.
Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(5):290-297. doi: 10.1159/000492203. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
8
Longitudinal Pure-Tone Threshold Changes in the Same Subjects: Analysis of Factors Affecting Hearing.
Laryngoscope. 2019 Feb;129(2):470-476. doi: 10.1002/lary.27478. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Hearing Disability Prevalence and Risk Factors in Two Recent National Surveys.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Sep;55(3):326-335. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
10
Association of Cardiovascular Comorbidities With Hearing Loss in the Older Old.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jul 1;144(7):623-629. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0643.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验