Suppr超能文献

在LATITUDE研究中应用删失加权逆概率法评估后续治疗效果对总生存期的影响。

Estimation of Overall Survival with Subsequent Treatment Effect by Applying Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighting in the LATITUDE Study.

作者信息

Koroki Yosuke, Taguri Masataka, Matsubara Nobuaki, Fizazi Karim

机构信息

Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.

Graduate School of Data Science, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Jan 6;36:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.11.012. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the LATITUDE study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01715285), compared with placebos, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) provided significant overall survival (OS) benefit in high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients. It is controversial whether survival benefits would remain if all patients in the placebo group subsequently received life-extending therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate treatment effect in the case of all patients in the placebo group receiving life-extending subsequent therapies.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A post hoc analysis of LATITUDE final-analysis data was carried out (setting and participants have been reported previously).

INTERVENTION

AAP or placebos plus ADT.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We applied the inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) method to represent the situation in which all patients in the placebo group would have received life-extending subsequent therapies. The OS hazard ratio (HR) of AAP versus placebos and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of the 581 eligible patients in the placebo group, 237 (40.8%) did not receive life-extending subsequent therapies. From the unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis, the HR for OS for AAP versus placebos was 0.661 (95% CI 0.564-0.775). Using IPCW to adjust for patients in the placebo group without life-extending subsequent therapies, the HR was 0.732 (95% CI 0.604-0.887). A limitation is a lack of proof that the Cox proportional hazards model for the absence of life-extending subsequent therapy is correctly specified for the IPCW method.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with AAP exerts OS benefit over placebos in high-risk mCSPC patients, regardless of whether life-extending subsequent therapy is given.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In a previous study, high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients who received abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) with androgen deprivation therapy generally survived longer than those given placebos. The benefit of adding AAP continues regardless of whether life-extending subsequent therapy is given.

摘要

背景

在LATITUDE研究(ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01715285)中,与安慰剂相比,醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松(AAP)与雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)在高危转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌(mCSPC)患者中提供了显著的总生存期(OS)获益。如果安慰剂组的所有患者随后都接受延长生命的治疗,生存获益是否仍然存在存在争议。

目的

评估安慰剂组所有患者接受延长生命的后续治疗情况下的治疗效果。

设计、背景和参与者:对LATITUDE最终分析数据进行了事后分析(背景和参与者先前已报告)。

干预措施

AAP或安慰剂联合ADT。

结局测量和统计分析

我们应用删失加权逆概率(IPCW)方法来代表安慰剂组所有患者都接受延长生命的后续治疗的情况。使用Cox比例风险模型估计AAP与安慰剂相比的OS风险比(HR)及相关的95%置信区间(CI)。

结果和局限性

在安慰剂组的581例符合条件的患者中,237例(40.8%)未接受延长生命的后续治疗。从未调整的意向性分析来看,AAP与安慰剂相比的OS的HR为0.661(95%CI 0.564 - 0.775)。使用IPCW对安慰剂组中未接受延长生命后续治疗的患者进行调整后,HR为0.732(95%CI 0.604 - 0.887)。一个局限性是缺乏证据表明针对未接受延长生命后续治疗的情况,Cox比例风险模型对于IPCW方法的设定是正确的。

结论

在高危mCSPC患者中,无论是否给予延长生命的后续治疗,AAP治疗均比安慰剂具有OS获益。

患者总结

在先前的一项研究中,接受醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松(AAP)与雄激素剥夺疗法的高危转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌患者通常比接受安慰剂的患者存活时间更长。无论是否给予延长生命的后续治疗,添加AAP的获益仍然存在。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcf/8783036/759e96cb9c42/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验