Suppr超能文献

竞技高尔夫活动能量消耗评估:背包、电动或手动推车的影响。

Assessment of activity energy expenditure during competitive golf: The effects of bag carrying, electric or manual trolleys.

机构信息

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

Tournament Golf College, Duchy College, Stoke Climsland, Cornwall, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Mar;23(3):330-337. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2036817. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

Abstract

Golf is a sport played around the globe, with an estimated 42.6 million people playing within the United Kingdom and United States of America alone. To date, there is limited data on the energy expenditure of golf. The present study assessed the activity energy expenditure (AEE) of 16 high-standard (handicap under 5) golfers who completed three rounds of competitive golf either carrying the golf bag (BC), using a manual push trolley (MT) or an electric trolley (ET) (Stewart Golf, Gloucester, UK). Prior to each round, participants were fitted with an Actiheart® accelerometer (Camntech, Fenstanton, UK) to estimate AEE, whilst ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and enjoyment were collected following each round. Data were analysed using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA, with Hedges effect sizes (ES) calculated. Mean (SD) AEE was 688 ± 213 kcal for BC, 756 ± 210 kcal for MT and 663 ± 218 kcal for ET (= .05) although these differences were deemed or less. The ET condition resulted in the lowest mean heart rate, or from BC or MT, respectively. There were no significant differences in enjoyment although perceived exertion was lowest in the ET condition. In summary, we report meaningful differences in AEE between the three conditions (= .05), with perceived exertion and maximum HR being lowest when using the electric trolley. Golf may be considered as an effective intervention to increase step count and improve physical activity levels across the general population regardless of transportation methods of clubs.

摘要

高尔夫是一项在全球范围内开展的运动,仅在美国和英国,就有估计 4260 万人参与高尔夫运动。迄今为止,关于高尔夫的能量消耗数据有限。本研究评估了 16 名高水平(低于 5 杆)高尔夫球手在携带球包(BC)、使用手动推车(MT)或电动推车(ET)(Stewart Golf,英国格洛斯特)完成三轮比赛时的活动能量消耗(AEE)。在每轮比赛之前,参与者都佩戴 Actiheart®加速度计(Camntech,英国芬斯通顿)来估计 AEE,同时在每轮比赛后收集感知用力(RPE)和享受度评分。数据使用单向重复测量方差分析进行分析,并计算了 Hedges 效应大小(ES)。BC、MT 和 ET 的平均(SD)AEE 分别为 688±213 千卡、756±210 千卡和 663±218 千卡(差异无统计学意义)。尽管如此,ET 条件下的平均心率最低,分别比 BC 或 MT 低 或 。尽管享受度没有显著差异,但感知用力最低的是 ET 条件。总之,我们报告了三种条件之间的 AEE 存在有意义的差异(差异无统计学意义),使用电动推车时,感知用力和最大 HR 最低。无论使用哪种球杆运输方式,高尔夫都可以被视为一种有效的干预措施,以增加步数并提高普通人群的身体活动水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验