Suppr超能文献

成人重建 fellowship 的申请人排名标准:申请 fellowship 时面试很重要。

Applicant Ranking Criteria in Adult Reconstruction Fellowship: Your Interview Counts When Applying for Fellowship.

作者信息

Patel Shyam A, Glasser Jillian, Berns Ellis M, Barrett Caitlin C, Jenkins Derek, Antoci Valentin, Cohen Eric, Froehlich John

机构信息

Orthopaedics, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, USA.

Adult Reconstruction, University Orthopedics, Providence, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Dec 23;13(12):e20636. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20636. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Background The criteria for successful ranking in the fellowship match remains unclear. Although some data are available regarding the qualities sought after in medical students for the residency match, little information is available regarding the fellowship match. In this study, for arthroplasty applications to our institution, the interview was hypothesized to be the most important factor for ranking, with little impact from other commonly assessed variables. Methodology All 40 applicants who applied for fellowship were selected to interview for the 2017 Brown University Comprehensive Adult Reconstruction Fellowship and were evaluated on the interview, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, letters of recommendation, personal statement, extracurricular activities, research, and caliber of undergraduate institution, medical school, and residency program. The interview score was based on a combined score of individual components of personality, program fit, and research. Results Of the 40 applicants who were interviewed, eight did not match. The interview score was the only statistically significant variable and had the highest correlation with ranking (r = 0.92). Moreover, extracurricular activities correlated with a higher ranking whereas USMLE Step 1/Step 2 scores had a relatively low correlation (r = 0.32 and 0.29, respectively). Recommendation letters and caliber of medical school, undergraduate education, and residency demonstrated low correlations. The personal statement and research components had the lowest correlations. Conclusions The combined interview score, in particular the personality and program fit components, was the most important determinant of successful ranking at our institution. Because all 40 applicants who applied for an arthroplasty fellowship at our institution were selected for an interview, there was no pre-interview selection bias that would confound these results. However, the ranking does not correlate with an applicant's success in fellowship, and further research is required to determine the qualifications of a successful surgeon.

摘要

背景

在专科医师匹配中成功排名的标准仍不明确。尽管有一些关于住院医师匹配中对医学生所看重素质的数据,但关于专科医师匹配的信息却很少。在本研究中,对于申请我校关节置换专科医师项目的情况,假设面试是排名的最重要因素,而其他常见评估变量的影响较小。

方法

所有40名申请专科医师项目的申请人都被选中参加2017年布朗大学成人重建综合专科医师项目的面试,并在面试、美国医师执照考试(USMLE)成绩、推荐信、个人陈述、课外活动、研究以及本科院校、医学院和住院医师项目的水平等方面接受评估。面试分数基于个性、项目匹配度和研究等各个组成部分的综合得分。

结果

在接受面试的40名申请人中,有8人未匹配成功。面试分数是唯一具有统计学显著性的变量,并且与排名的相关性最高(r = 0.92)。此外,课外活动与较高排名相关,而USMLE第一步/第二步成绩的相关性相对较低(分别为r = 0.32和0.29)。推荐信以及医学院、本科教育和住院医师项目的水平显示出较低的相关性。个人陈述和研究部分的相关性最低。

结论

综合面试分数,特别是个性和项目匹配度部分,是我校成功排名的最重要决定因素。由于申请我校关节置换专科医师项目的所有40名申请人都被选中参加面试,因此不存在会混淆这些结果的面试前选择偏差。然而,排名与申请人在专科医师项目中的成功与否并无关联,需要进一步研究以确定一名成功外科医生的资质。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab56/8783569/df7489ea42f7/cureus-0013-00000020636-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验