Leal Lisiane Freitas, Osorio-de-Castro Claudia Garcia Serpa, de Souza Luiz Júpiter Carneiro, Ferre Felipe, Mota Daniel Marques, Ito Marcia, Elseviers Monique, Lima Elisangela da Costa, Zimmernan Ivan Ricardo, Fulone Izabela, Carvalho-Soares Monica Da Luz, Lopes Luciane Cruz
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 14;12:789872. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.789872. eCollection 2021.
In Brazil, studies that map electronic healthcare databases in order to assess their suitability for use in pharmacoepidemiologic research are lacking. We aimed to identify, catalogue, and characterize Brazilian data sources for Drug Utilization Research (DUR). The present study is part of the project entitled, "Publicly Available Data Sources for Drug Utilization Research in Latin American (LatAm) Countries." A network of Brazilian health experts was assembled to map secondary administrative data from healthcare organizations that might provide information related to medication use. A multi-phase approach including internet search of institutional government websites, traditional bibliographic databases, and experts' input was used for mapping the data sources. The reviewers searched, screened and selected the data sources independently; disagreements were resolved by consensus. Data sources were grouped into the following categories: 1) automated databases; 2) Electronic Medical Records (EMR); 3) national surveys or datasets; 4) adverse event reporting systems; and 5) others. Each data source was characterized by accessibility, geographic granularity, setting, type of data (aggregate or individual-level), and years of coverage. We also searched for publications related to each data source. A total of 62 data sources were identified and screened; 38 met the eligibility criteria for inclusion and were fully characterized. We grouped 23 (60%) as automated databases, four (11%) as adverse event reporting systems, four (11%) as EMRs, three (8%) as national surveys or datasets, and four (11%) as other types. Eighteen (47%) were classified as publicly and conveniently accessible online; providing information at national level. Most of them offered more than 5 years of comprehensive data coverage, and presented data at both the individual and aggregated levels. No information about population coverage was found. Drug coding is not uniform; each data source has its own coding system, depending on the purpose of the data. At least one scientific publication was found for each publicly available data source. There are several types of data sources for DUR in Brazil, but a uniform system for drug classification and data quality evaluation does not exist. The extent of population covered by year is unknown. Our comprehensive and structured inventory reveals a need for full characterization of these data sources.
在巴西,缺乏旨在评估电子医疗数据库是否适用于药物流行病学研究的相关映射研究。我们旨在识别、编目和描述巴西药物利用研究(DUR)的数据来源。本研究是名为“拉丁美洲(LatAm)国家药物利用研究的公开可用数据源”项目的一部分。我们组建了一个巴西健康专家网络,以梳理可能提供与药物使用相关信息的医疗保健机构的二级管理数据。采用了多阶段方法,包括对政府机构网站进行互联网搜索、传统文献数据库搜索以及专家意见,来梳理数据来源。评审人员独立搜索、筛选和选择数据来源;分歧通过协商一致解决。数据来源分为以下几类:1)自动化数据库;2)电子病历(EMR);3)全国性调查或数据集;4)不良事件报告系统;5)其他。每个数据来源的特征包括可访问性、地理粒度、环境、数据类型(汇总或个体层面)以及覆盖年份。我们还搜索了与每个数据来源相关的出版物。总共识别并筛选了62个数据来源;38个符合纳入资格标准并得到了全面描述。我们将23个(60%)归类为自动化数据库,4个(11%)归类为不良事件报告系统,4个(11%)归类为电子病历,3个(8%)归类为全国性调查或数据集,4个(11%)归类为其他类型。18个(47%)被归类为可公开且方便在线访问;在国家层面提供信息。其中大多数提供了超过5年的全面数据覆盖,并在个体和汇总层面呈现数据。未找到有关人群覆盖范围的信息。药物编码不统一;每个数据来源都有自己的编码系统,这取决于数据的用途。每个公开可用的数据来源至少都有一篇科学出版物。巴西有几种类型的药物利用研究数据来源,但不存在统一的药物分类和数据质量评估系统。每年覆盖的人群范围未知。我们全面且结构化的清单显示需要对这些数据来源进行全面描述。