O'Donovan B, Mooney Therese, Rimmer Ben, Fitzpatrick Patricia, Flannelly Grainne, Doherty Lorraine, Russell Noirin, Martin Cara M, O'Leary John J, Sharp Linda, O'Connor Mairead
Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Ireland.
Department of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Dec 27;25:101684. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101684. eCollection 2022 Feb.
There is a paucity of data on trust of service users in cervical screening. A significant controversy in Ireland's national cervical cancer screening programme emerged in 2018. The Health Service Executive (HSE) confirmed that a clinical audit had revealed that more than 200 women who developed cancer had not been told of earlier misdiagnosed smear tests. During this high profile controversy we conducted qualitative interviews exploring factors that influence cervical screening participation. Women who had been invited for routine screening tests were recruited from the national screening register. Telephone interviews were conducted with 48 women aged 25-65 years; with a range of screening histories - 34 were adequately screened (attended all routine screening tests) and 14 were inadequately screened (attended some/no screening tests). Thematic analysis was conducted and all interviewees spontaneously raised the screening controversy revealing that the crisis had resulted in serious loss of trust, faith and confidence in the screening programme. Publicity surrounding the controversy had some beneficial effects, including increased awareness of the value of screening and beliefs that intense focus on the programme will improve the service long-term. Strategies which incorporate these findings could help rebuild trust in screening.
关于服务使用者对宫颈癌筛查的信任,相关数据匮乏。2018年,爱尔兰国家宫颈癌筛查计划引发了一场重大争议。卫生服务执行局(HSE)证实,一项临床审计显示,超过200名患癌女性此前未被告知其涂片检查曾被误诊。在这场备受瞩目的争议期间,我们进行了定性访谈,以探究影响宫颈癌筛查参与度的因素。从国家筛查登记册中招募了受邀参加常规筛查测试的女性。对48名年龄在25至65岁之间的女性进行了电话访谈;她们有着不同的筛查史——34人接受了充分筛查(参加了所有常规筛查测试),14人接受了不充分筛查(参加了部分/未参加任何筛查测试)。我们进行了主题分析,所有受访者都自发提到了筛查争议,表明这场危机导致对筛查计划的信任、信心和信念严重丧失。围绕该争议的宣传产生了一些有益影响,包括提高了对筛查价值的认识,以及相信对该计划的高度关注将长期改善服务。纳入这些研究结果的策略有助于重建对筛查的信任。