Harlow Siobán D, Burnett-Bowie Sherri-Ann M, Greendale Gail A, Avis Nancy E, Reeves Alexis N, Richards Thomas R, Lewis Tené T
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, United States, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104-2029, USA.
Endocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Womens Midlife Health. 2022 Feb 8;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40695-022-00073-y.
This paper reviews differences in the experience of the menopause transition and midlife health outcomes between Black and White women who participated in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a 25-year, longitudinal, multi-racial/ethnic cohort study. We identify health disparities, i.e., instances in which Black women's outcomes are less favorable than those of White women, and consider whether structural racism may underlie these disparities. Although SWAN did not explicitly assess structural racism, Black women in SWAN grew up during the Jim Crow era in the United States, during which time racism was legally sanctioned. We consider how we might gain insight into structural racism by examining proxy exposures such as socioeconomic characteristics, reports of everyday discrimination, and a range of life stressors, which likely reflect the longstanding, pervasive and persistent inequities that have roots in systemic racism in the US. Thus, this paper reviews the presence, magnitude, and longitudinal patterns of racial disparities observed in SWAN in six areas of women's health - menopause symptoms, sleep, mental health, health related quality of life, cardio-metabolic health, and physical function -and elucidates the contextual factors that are likely influencing these disparities. We review the strengths and weaknesses of SWAN's design and approach to analysis of racial disparities and use this as a springboard to offer recommendations for future cohort studies.
本文回顾了参与“全国女性健康研究”(SWAN)的黑人和白人女性在更年期过渡经历和中年健康结果方面的差异。SWAN是一项为期25年的纵向多种族/族裔队列研究。我们识别了健康差异,即黑人女性的结果不如白人女性的情况,并探讨结构性种族主义是否可能是这些差异的潜在原因。尽管SWAN没有明确评估结构性种族主义,但参与该研究的黑人女性在美国吉姆·克劳时代长大,当时种族主义在法律上得到认可。我们考虑如何通过研究代理暴露因素,如社会经济特征、日常歧视报告以及一系列生活压力源,来深入了解结构性种族主义,这些因素可能反映了美国系统性种族主义中长期存在、普遍且持续的不平等。因此,本文回顾了在SWAN中观察到的女性健康六个领域——更年期症状、睡眠、心理健康、健康相关生活质量、心血管代谢健康和身体功能——中种族差异的存在情况、程度和纵向模式,并阐明了可能影响这些差异的背景因素。我们回顾了SWAN设计和分析种族差异方法的优缺点,并以此为契机为未来的队列研究提供建议。