Waldron Kristen, Brown Matthew, Calderon Ariana, Feldman Michael
BodyCentral Physical Therapy, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.
University of Arizona College of Medicine, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jan 28;4(1):e175-e179. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.027. eCollection 2022 Jan.
This article summarizes the benefits and limitations of various approaches of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation, more specifically a conservative or traditional rehabilitation approach versus a more accelerated approach. The conservative model is considered one with a return to sport at 9 months or later with more time-based criteria, and an accelerated approach is defined as one with a goal of return to sport by 6 months. Although there are some similarities between the 2 types of rehabilitation, key differences exist and will be highlighted. Additionally, we discuss a criteria-based return-to-sport model that we favor.
V, expert opinion.
本文总结了前交叉韧带(ACL)康复的各种方法的益处和局限性,更具体地说是保守或传统康复方法与更快速康复方法之间的比较。保守模式被认为是一种基于时间标准、在9个月或更晚恢复运动的模式,而快速康复方法则定义为以在6个月内恢复运动为目标的模式。虽然这两种康复类型之间存在一些相似之处,但关键差异也存在并将被突出强调。此外,我们还讨论了一种我们所支持的基于标准的恢复运动模式。
V,专家意见。