Suppr超能文献

一种成功且具成本效益的腰痛分诊系统:一项试点研究。

A successful, cost-effective low back pain triage system: a pilot study.

作者信息

Hall Hamilton, Prostko E Richard, Haring Katie, Fischer Michael, Cheng Boyle C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada.

Neurosurgery Department, Allegheny Health Network, United States.

出版信息

N Am Spine Soc J. 2021 Feb 1;5:100051. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100051. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Effective triage - directing patients with low back pain to appropriate treatment or correct referral - is fundamental to quality care. Without guidelines, a physician's initial decision may lead to unnecessary investigation, unneeded intervention or unwarranted consultation. To compare the functional outcomes of patients triaged by a classification based on clinical presentation with those of patients selected at the clinicians' discretion, an insurance-owned hospital network employed forty-seven specially-trained physical therapists, working within participating primary care practices, to classify low back pain patients into specific Patterns of Pain. Between October 2017 and April 2019, the primary care physicians used this classification, derived entirely from the patient's history and physical examination, to direct subsequent treatment for 260 consecutive low back pain patients. Patients with systemic symptoms, recent substantial trauma or non-mechanical diagnoses indicative of spinal infections or possible malignancy were excluded. Functional outcome measures were spinal imaging, opioid use, length of treatment and number of visits, back-related unplanned care, frequency of spinal surgery and back-related episode cost. These were compared with a control group of 256 propensity-matched patients and, for assessing the financial impact, with a historic cohort of 111 previously treated, non-classified patients. : Spinal imaging: study group 24.5%; controls 42.2% (< .001). Narcotic use: study group 4.6%; controls 13.3% (< .001). Treatment length: study group 62.2 days; controls 74.5 days (=.10). Treatment visits: study group 1528 visits; controls 2,046 visits (=.003). Unplanned care: study group 1.9%; controls 12.8% (< .001). Spine surgery: study group 15.4%; controls 26.2% (=.005). Episode cost: study group $1453; controls $2334 (=.005). A well-defined clinically-based triage system produced meaningful reductions in imaging, opioid use, treatment duration, unplanned interventions, surgery and cost of care.

摘要

有效的分诊——将腰痛患者引导至适当的治疗或正确的转诊——是优质医疗的基础。没有指南,医生的初步决定可能会导致不必要的检查、不必要的干预或无根据的会诊。为了比较根据临床表现进行分类分诊的患者与临床医生自行选择的患者的功能结局,一家保险旗下的医院网络雇佣了47名经过专门培训的物理治疗师,在参与的初级保健机构中工作,将腰痛患者分为特定的疼痛模式。在2017年10月至2019年4月期间,初级保健医生使用这种完全基于患者病史和体格检查得出的分类方法,对连续260例腰痛患者进行后续治疗指导。排除有全身症状、近期严重创伤或提示脊柱感染或可能恶性肿瘤的非机械性诊断的患者。功能结局指标包括脊柱成像、阿片类药物使用情况、治疗时长和就诊次数、与背部相关的非计划护理、脊柱手术频率以及与背部相关的单次治疗费用。将这些指标与256例倾向匹配患者的对照组进行比较,并为评估经济影响,与111例先前接受治疗的未分类患者的历史队列进行比较。结果如下:脊柱成像:研究组24.5%;对照组42.2%(<0.001)。麻醉药物使用:研究组4.6%;对照组13.3%(<0.001)。治疗时长:研究组62.2天;对照组74.5天(=0.10)。治疗就诊次数:研究组1528次;对照组2046次(=0.003)。非计划护理:研究组1.9%;对照组12.8%(<0.001)。脊柱手术:研究组15.4%;对照组26.2%(=0.005)。单次治疗费用:研究组1453美元;对照组2334美元(=0.005)。一个定义明确的基于临床的分诊系统在成像、阿片类药物使用、治疗持续时间、非计划干预、手术和护理成本方面产生了显著降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验