Suppr超能文献

Duhamel 与经肛门内拖出术治疗先天性巨结肠的对比队列研究。

Comparative cohort study of Duhamel and endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease.

机构信息

Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.

Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, GOS-UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2022 Jan 6;6(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab143.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are limited data available to compare outcomes between surgical approaches for Hirschsprung's disease. Duhamel and endorectal pull-through (ERPT) are two of the most common procedures performed worldwide.

METHODS

Objective outcomes were compared between contemporary cohorts (aged 4-32 years) after Duhamel or ERPT using case-control methodology. Data were collected using prospectively administered standardized questionnaires on bowel and bladder function and quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Short form 36 and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index). Patients were compared in two age groups (18 years and younger and older than 18 years) and reference made to normative control data. Multivariable analysis explored factors associated with poor outcomes.

RESULTS

Cohorts were well matched by demographics, disease characteristics and incidence of postoperative complications (120 patients who underwent Duhamel versus 57 patients who had ERPT). Bowel function scores were similar between groups. Patients who underwent Duhamel demonstrated worse constipation and inferior faecal awareness scores (P < 0.01 for both age groups). Recurrent postoperative enterocolitis was significantly more common after ERPT (34 versus 6 per cent; odds ratio 15.56 (95 per cent c.i. 6.19 to 39.24; P < 0.0001)). On multivariable analysis, poor bowel outcome was the only factor significantly associated with poor urinary outcome (adjusted odds ratio 6.66 (95 per cent c.i. 1.74 to 25.50; P = 0.006)) and was significantly associated with markedly reduced quality of life (QoL) in all instruments used (P < 0.001 for all). There were no associations between QoL measures and pull-through technique.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes from Duhamel and ERPT are good in the majority of cases, with comparable bowel function scores. Constipation and impaired faecal awareness were more prevalent after Duhamel, with differences sustained in adulthood. Recurrent enterocolitis was significantly more prevalent after ERPT. Clustering of poor QoL and poor functional outcomes were observed in both cohorts, with seemingly little effect by choice of surgical procedure in terms of QoL.

摘要

背景

目前可用于比较巨结肠症不同手术方法治疗效果的资料有限。Duhamel 手术和经肛门内拖出术(endorectal pull-through,ERPT)是目前全球应用最广泛的两种术式。

方法

采用病例对照研究方法,比较采用 Duhamel 手术和 ERPT 治疗的两组巨结肠症患者(年龄 4-32 岁)的术后客观结局。通过前瞻性管理的标准化问卷收集有关肠和膀胱功能及生活质量(Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory,PedsQL 量表;Short form 36,SF-36 量表和 Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index,GIQLI 量表)的数据。根据年龄(18 岁及以下和 18 岁以上)将患者分为两组,并与参考人群的正常对照数据进行比较。多变量分析探讨与不良结局相关的因素。

结果

两组患者在人口统计学、疾病特征和术后并发症发生率方面具有可比性(120 例行 Duhamel 手术患者和 57 例行 ERPT 患者)。两组患者的肠道功能评分相似。Duhamel 手术组患者的便秘和粪便意识评分较差(两组患者均为 P<0.01)。ERPT 术后复发性术后结肠炎更为常见(34%比 6%;优势比 15.56(95%置信区间 6.19-39.24;P<0.0001))。多变量分析显示,不良肠道结局是唯一与不良尿结局显著相关的因素(调整后的优势比 6.66(95%置信区间 1.74-25.50;P=0.006)),且与所有使用的工具的生活质量(QoL)明显降低显著相关(所有 P<0.001)。QoL 指标与经肛门内拖出术技术之间没有关联。

结论

在大多数情况下,Duhamel 手术和 ERPT 的治疗效果良好,肠道功能评分相似。Duhamel 手术后便秘和粪便意识受损更为常见,且在成年期仍持续存在。ERPT 术后复发性结肠炎更为常见。两组患者均存在 QoL 和功能结局不良的聚集现象,手术方式对 QoL 似乎影响不大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edbd/8830754/abcb17e24d85/zrab143f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验