Wang Yonglin, Tang Jie, Vimal Vivekanand Pandey, Lackner James R, DiZio Paul, Hong Pengyu
Computer Science Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States.
Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States.
Front Physiol. 2022 Jan 28;13:806357. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.806357. eCollection 2022.
Were astronauts forced to land on the surface of Mars using manual control of their vehicle, they would not have familiar gravitational cues because Mars' gravity is only 0.38 g. They could become susceptible to spatial disorientation, potentially causing mission ending crashes. In our earlier studies, we secured blindfolded participants into a Multi-Axis Rotation System (MARS) device that was programmed to behave like an inverted pendulum. Participants used a joystick to stabilize around the balance point. We created a spaceflight analog condition by having participants dynamically balance in the horizontal roll plane, where they did not tilt relative to the gravitational vertical and therefore could not use gravitational cues to determine their position. We found 90% of participants in our spaceflight analog condition reported spatial disorientation and all of them showed it in their data. There was a high rate of crashing into boundaries that were set at ± 60 from the balance point. Our goal was to see whether we could use deep learning to predict the occurrence of crashes before they happened. We used stacked gated recurrent units (GRU) to predict crash events 800 ms in advance with an AUC (area under the curve) value of 99%. When we prioritized reducing false negatives we found it resulted in more false positives. We found that false negatives occurred when participants made destabilizing joystick deflections that rapidly moved the MARS away from the balance point. These unpredictable destabilizing joystick deflections, which occurred in the duration of time after the input data, are likely a result of spatial disorientation. If our model could work in real time, we calculated that immediate human action would result in the prevention of 80.7% of crashes, however, if we accounted for human reaction times (∼400 ms), only 30.3% of crashes could be prevented, suggesting that one solution could be an AI taking temporary control of the spacecraft during these moments.
如果宇航员被迫通过手动控制飞行器在火星表面着陆,他们将不会有熟悉的重力线索,因为火星的重力只有0.38g。他们可能会容易出现空间定向障碍,这有可能导致任务终结的坠毁事故。在我们早期的研究中,我们将蒙住眼睛的参与者固定在一个多轴旋转系统(MARS)装置中,该装置被编程为像一个倒立摆一样运行。参与者使用操纵杆在平衡点周围保持稳定。我们通过让参与者在水平滚动平面上动态平衡来创建一个太空飞行模拟条件,在这个平面上他们不会相对于重力垂直方向倾斜,因此无法利用重力线索来确定自己的位置。我们发现在我们的太空飞行模拟条件下,90%的参与者报告有空间定向障碍,而且他们所有人的数据都显示了这一点。撞到距离平衡点±60处设置的边界的发生率很高。我们的目标是看看是否可以使用深度学习在坠毁事故发生前预测其发生情况。我们使用堆叠门控循环单元(GRU)提前800毫秒预测坠毁事件,曲线下面积(AUC)值为99%。当我们优先减少假阴性时,我们发现这会导致更多假阳性结果。我们发现,当参与者做出使操纵杆不稳定的偏转动作,从而使MARS迅速远离平衡点时,就会出现假阴性。这些不可预测的使操纵杆不稳定的偏转动作发生在输入数据之后的时间段内,很可能是空间定向障碍的结果。如果我们的模型能够实时运行,我们计算得出立即采取人为行动将能预防80.7%的坠毁事故,然而,如果考虑到人类的反应时间(约400毫秒),则只能预防30.3%的坠毁事故,这表明一种解决方案可能是在这些时刻让人工智能临时控制航天器。