University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, 101 S. Fairview Rd, Columbia, Missouri, 65203, USA.
University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03134-y.
Engaging residents in meaningful quality improvement (QI) is difficult. Challenges include competing demands, didactics which lack connection to meaningful work, suboptimal experiential learning, unclear accountability, absence of timely and relevant data, and lack of faculty coaches and role models. Various strategies to address these challenges for engagement have been described, but not as a unified approach. This paper describes a bundle of practical strategies to address common challenges to resident engagement in QI, illustrated through the experience of one residency education program.
62 categorical residents in the University of Missouri Internal Medicine residency participated in a longitudinal QI curriculum integrated into residency clinic assignments with dedicated QI work sessions and brief just-in-time didactics with mentorship from faculty coaches. Residents completed at least two PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles for their projects. The experience included clear expectations and tools for accountability. Project criteria included importance to patients, residents, and the institution. Residents had access to data related to their own practice. A pre-post survey asked residents to self-assess their level of interest and engagement in QI on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 = least desired and 5 = most desired result. Data were analyzed by paired t-test.
All 62 residents participated in the program as members of ten QI teams. 40/62 residents completed both pre- and post-surveys. Items related to self-assessment of QI in clinical work all changed in the desired direction: likelihood of participation (3.7 to 4.1, p = 0.03), frequency of QI use (3.3 to 3.9, p = 0.001), and opinion about using QI in clinical work (3.9 to 4.0, p = 0.21). Resident assessment of QI priority in clinical work did not change.
We implemented a practical strategies bundle to overcome common challenges to successfully engaging residents in clinical quality improvement. These strategies included QI work integrated into routine clinical assignments, just-in-time didactics, experiential learning with clear expectations and strategic project selection, timely and pertinent data from the residents' own practice, and real-time faculty coaching.
让住院医师参与有意义的质量改进(QI)是困难的。挑战包括竞争需求、与有意义的工作缺乏联系的教学、经验学习不理想、责任不明确、缺乏及时和相关的数据以及缺乏教师教练和榜样。已经描述了各种解决这些参与挑战的策略,但不是作为一个统一的方法。本文通过一个住院医师教育项目的经验,描述了一套实用的策略,以解决住院医师参与 QI 常见的挑战。
密苏里大学内科住院医师的 62 名住院医师参加了一项纵向 QI 课程,该课程与住院医师临床任务相结合,专门安排 QI 工作会议,并提供简短的及时教学,由教师教练提供指导。住院医师至少要为他们的项目完成两个 PDSA(计划-执行-研究-行动)循环。该经验包括明确的期望和问责制工具。项目标准包括对患者、住院医师和机构的重要性。住院医师可以访问与其自身实践相关的数据。一项前后调查要求住院医师在 5 分制的李克特量表上自我评估他们对 QI 的兴趣和参与程度,1 表示最不希望,5 表示最希望。数据采用配对 t 检验进行分析。
所有 62 名住院医师都作为十个 QI 团队的成员参加了该项目。40/62 名住院医师完成了前后调查。与临床工作中自我评估 QI 相关的所有项目都朝着期望的方向变化:参与的可能性(3.7 到 4.1,p=0.03)、QI 使用的频率(3.3 到 3.9,p=0.001)和对在临床工作中使用 QI 的看法(3.9 到 4.0,p=0.21)。住院医师对临床工作中 QI 优先级的评估没有改变。
我们实施了一套实用的策略,以克服成功吸引住院医师参与临床质量改进的常见挑战。这些策略包括将 QI 工作整合到常规临床任务中、及时的教学、具有明确期望和战略项目选择的体验式学习、来自住院医师自身实践的及时和相关数据,以及实时的教师指导。