Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
School of Social Work, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Ethn Health. 2023 Jan;28(1):96-113. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2022.2027879. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
We examined Latinx immigrants' perceptions of US policy related to restrictions on immigrants' use of public resources and their thoughts about the influence of these on immigrants' healthcare utilization.
A series of 16 focus group discussions with Latinx immigrant men and women (documented and undocumented) ( = 130) were conducted between May and July 2017 across four US cities.
Four central themes emerged: participants attributed the limited resources available for affordable healthcare for many uninsured US immigrants (both documented and undocumented) to the US government's view of immigrants as burdens on public resources and its subsequent unwillingness to dedicate funds for their care; participants expressed concerns, some unfounded, about negative immigration ramifications arising from diagnosis with health conditions perceived to be serious and/or expensive to treat; participants noted that some immigrants avoided using health programs and services to which they were entitled because of immigration concerns; finally, participants described how access to information on immigration laws and healthcare resources, and conversely, misinformation about these, influenced healthcare utilization.
Participants were acutely aware of the image of immigrants as public charges or potential burdens on government resources that underlies US immigration policy. In some cases, participants came to inaccurate and potentially harmful conclusions about the substance of laws and regulations based on their beliefs about the government's rejection of immigrants who may burden public resources. This underscores the importance of ensuring that immigrants have access to information on immigration-related laws and regulations and on healthcare resources available to them. Participants noted that access to information also fostered resilience to widespread misinformation. Importantly, however, participants' beliefs had some basis in US immigration policy discourse. Law and policy makers should reconsider legislation and political commentary that frame self-reliance, the guiding principle of US immigration policy, in terms of immigrants' use of publicly funded healthcare resources.
我们调查了拉丁裔移民对美国与限制移民使用公共资源相关政策的看法,以及他们对这些政策对移民医疗保健利用影响的看法。
2017 年 5 月至 7 月,在四个美国城市进行了一系列 16 次拉丁裔移民男女(有记录和无记录)焦点小组讨论( = 130)。
出现了四个核心主题:参与者将许多没有保险的美国移民(有记录和无记录)可获得负担得起的医疗保健资源有限归因于美国政府将移民视为公共资源负担的观点,以及随后不愿为他们的医疗保健提供资金;参与者对因被诊断出被认为严重和/或昂贵治疗的健康状况而可能产生的负面移民后果表示担忧,有些担忧是没有根据的;参与者指出,一些移民因为担心移民问题而避免使用他们有权享受的健康计划和服务;最后,参与者描述了他们如何获得有关移民法和医疗保健资源的信息,以及相反,有关这些的错误信息如何影响医疗保健的利用。
参与者敏锐地意识到,美国移民政策背后存在移民是公共负担或潜在政府资源负担的形象。在某些情况下,参与者根据他们对政府拒绝可能给公共资源带来负担的移民的信念,对法律和法规的实质内容得出不准确且可能有害的结论。这突显出确保移民能够获得有关移民相关法律和法规以及他们可获得的医疗保健资源的信息的重要性。参与者指出,获取信息也促进了对广泛错误信息的适应力。然而,重要的是,参与者的信念在美国移民政策话语中有一定的依据。法律和政策制定者应重新考虑将美国移民政策的指导原则——自力更生——表述为移民使用公共资助的医疗保健资源的立法和政治言论。