Suppr超能文献

逼尿肌活动低下患者的骶神经调节:生物性别是一个指标吗?

Sacral neuromodulation in patients with detrusor underactivity: Is biological sex an indicator?

作者信息

Onur Rahmi, Tayebi Sona, Salehi-Pourmehr Hanieh, Jahantabi Elham, Perrouin-Verbe Marie-Aimee, Naseri Changiz, Hajebrahimi Sakineh, Hashim Hashim

机构信息

Department of Urology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Mar;41(3):847-859. doi: 10.1002/nau.24893. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to report sacral neuromodulation (SNM) outcomes in detrusor underactivity (DU).

METHODS

A multicentric, multinational, retrospective case series was conducted between March 2017 and June 2021 in three different referral centers. Initial test phase stimulation included either a percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE) or an advanced lead evaluation test phase (ALTP) before permanent SNM implantation. The test phases were performed under local anesthesia, either in the outpatient (PNE) or operating room (ALTP), in the prone position, which was implanted in the third or fourth sacral foramina under fluoroscopic guidance. Patients with favorable response to the initial test phase during the first 2 weeks underwent the implantable pulse generator (IPG) implantation (Medtronic neurostimulation generator device InterStim™). Favorable response was defined as ≥ 50% improvement in symptoms, frequency of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and/or decrease in postvoid residual (PVR), increase in voided volume, or improvement in bladder voiding efficiency (BVE) based on the bladder diary.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were recruited with a mean age of 39.95 ± 15.28 years. Among the 58 cases, 36 (62.1%) patients responded to the initial stage. Of these, 12 patients (30.8%) with non-neurogenic etiology and nine patients (52.9%) with neurologic etiology did not respond to the initial test phase; thus, they did not undergo full implantation (p = 0.141). Voided volume, PVR, and the median maximum flow rate (Qmax) improved significantly (p < 0.001) in both sexes; however, there was no statistical difference between both genders. Most female cases (78.3%), and nearly half of the men (51.4%), responded to the test phase and were candidates for the IPG phase. Among the 35 cases who underwent IPG, 27 patients (72.2% of males, and 77.8% of females; p = 0.700) had a favorable response to IPG. 46.6% of patients had a successful outcome at the end of the study.

CONCLUSION

This multicentric study showed that SNM effectively and safely provided symptom improvement in refractory DU in males similar to females which is an important finding as previously it has been suggested that SNM works better in nonobstructive urinary retention in women and not in women.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告骶神经调节(SNM)治疗逼尿肌活动低下(DU)的效果。

方法

2017年3月至2021年6月在三个不同的转诊中心进行了一项多中心、跨国的回顾性病例系列研究。在永久性SNM植入前,初始测试阶段刺激包括经皮神经评估(PNE)或高级导联评估测试阶段(ALTP)。测试阶段在局部麻醉下进行,PNE在门诊进行,ALTP在手术室进行,患者取俯卧位,在透视引导下将电极植入第三或第四骶孔。在最初2周内对初始测试阶段反应良好的患者接受植入式脉冲发生器(IPG)植入(美敦力神经刺激发生器设备InterStim™)。根据膀胱日记,良好反应定义为症状改善≥50%、清洁间歇性导尿(CIC)频率和/或残余尿量(PVR)减少、排尿量增加或膀胱排尿效率(BVE)改善。

结果

招募了58例患者,平均年龄39.95±15.28岁。在这58例患者中,36例(62.1%)对初始阶段有反应。其中,12例(30.8%)非神经源性病因患者和9例(52.9%)神经源性病因患者对初始测试阶段无反应;因此,他们未进行完全植入(p = 0.141)。男女的排尿量、PVR和最大尿流率中位数(Qmax)均有显著改善(p < 0.001);然而,两性之间无统计学差异。大多数女性病例(78.3%)和近一半男性病例(51.4%)对测试阶段有反应,是IPG阶段的候选者。在接受IPG的35例患者中,27例患者(男性72.2%,女性77.8%;p = 0.700)对IPG有良好反应。46.6%的患者在研究结束时获得成功结果。

结论

这项多中心研究表明,SNM能有效且安全地改善男性和女性难治性DU的症状,这是一项重要发现,因为此前有人认为SNM在女性非梗阻性尿潴留中效果更好,而在男性中效果不佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验