do Nascimento Maia Paula, Bazhuni Pombo Sant'Anna Maria de Fátima, Parente Ana Alice Amaral Ibiapina, Baroni Aurilio Rafaela, Albino Servilha Silva Beatriz, Luiz Ronir Raggio, Sant'Anna Clemax Couto
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, pediatric pneumology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Asthma. 2023 Feb;60(2):270-276. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2045308. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
during functional respiratory assessments. The new digital peak flow meter (DPM) evaluates the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV) and PEF.
To compare lung function measurements using spirometry and DPM.
This cross-sectional analytical study assessed FEV and PEF in children with and without asthma. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the agreement between the measures using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman, and survival agreement plot.
125 (3-12 y) and 196 (6-18 y) children without and with asthma, respectively, were studied. In children without asthma, the ICC for FEV and PEF were 0.89 and 0.86, respectively, while the corresponding values were 0.87 and 0.79, respectively, in patients with asthma. The Bland-Altman method showed a difference of -0.4 to 0.5 for FEV in patients without asthma, with a tendency to increase as the FEV increased to a certain extent. In patients with asthma, the pattern was similar for FEV, and the PEF had a greater dispersion than among those without asthma; however, a good agreement pattern was maintained. In the survival agreement plot, when accepting a tolerance of 0.150 mL for FEV, there was an agreement of close to 55% in both groups. Likewise, when accepting a tolerance of 0.5 L/s for PEF, an agreement of close to 60% and 50% was observed in patients without and with asthma, respectively.
DPM was effective as a measure of lung function in pediatric patients with and without asthma.
在功能性呼吸评估期间。新型数字峰值流量计(DPM)可评估第一秒用力呼气量(FEV)和呼气峰值流速(PEF)。
比较使用肺量计和DPM进行的肺功能测量。
这项横断面分析研究评估了有无哮喘儿童的FEV和PEF。采用组内相关系数(ICC)、Bland-Altman法和生存一致性图进行统计分析,以评估测量值之间的一致性。
分别对125名(3 - 12岁)无哮喘儿童和196名(6 - 18岁)有哮喘儿童进行了研究。在无哮喘儿童中,FEV和PEF的ICC分别为0.89和0.86,而在哮喘患者中,相应值分别为0.87和0.79。Bland-Altman法显示,无哮喘患者FEV的差异为 -0.4至0.5,且随着FEV在一定程度上增加有增大趋势。在哮喘患者中,FEV的模式相似,PEF的离散度比无哮喘患者更大;然而,仍保持良好的一致性模式。在生存一致性图中,当FEV接受0.150 mL的容差时,两组的一致性接近55%。同样,当PEF接受0.5 L/s的容差时,无哮喘患者和哮喘患者的一致性分别接近60%和50%。
DPM作为评估有无哮喘儿科患者肺功能的一种方法是有效的。