Department of Safety Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, Korea.
Department of Construction Management, University of Washington, 105 Arch Hall, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042312.
Fatality rates such as fatalities per full-time equivalent workers are officially used to compare the risk level of the construction industry among various countries. However, each country evaluates the fatality rate using different conditions. This paper presents the comparison of fatality rates of various countries using conventional (national data) and pair (equivalent condition) methods through a time-series approach. The research was conducted in three stages. The risk level was evaluated in order in South Korea (1.54), Japan (0.84), Mexico (0.83), China (0.70), United Kingdom (0.15), and Singapore (0.13) in terms of national data. However, the risk level was re-evaluated in order in China (2.27), South Korea (2.05), Mexico (1.23), Singapore (0.98), Japan (0.80), and United Kingdom (0.47) in terms of equivalent conditions. The risk level of each can be changed when the fatality rate is compared under given equivalent conditions.
死亡率,例如每全职等效工人的死亡率,被正式用于比较不同国家建筑行业的风险水平。然而,每个国家都使用不同的条件来评估死亡率。本文通过时间序列方法,使用常规(国家数据)和配对(等效条件)方法比较了各国的死亡率。研究分三个阶段进行。根据国家数据,风险水平的评估顺序为韩国(1.54)、日本(0.84)、墨西哥(0.83)、中国(0.70)、英国(0.15)和新加坡(0.13)。然而,根据等效条件,风险水平的重新评估顺序为中国(2.27)、韩国(2.05)、墨西哥(1.23)、新加坡(0.98)、日本(0.80)和英国(0.47)。当在给定的等效条件下比较死亡率时,每个国家的风险水平都可能发生变化。