Suppr超能文献

一项为期 4 年的纵向研究,旨在调查灵活上学时间与成绩之间的关系。

A 4-year longitudinal study investigating the relationship between flexible school starts and grades.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 24;12(1):3178. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06804-5.

Abstract

The mismatch between teenagers' late sleep phase and early school start times results in acute and chronic sleep reductions. This is not only harmful for learning but may reduce career prospects and widen social inequalities. Delaying school start times has been shown to improve sleep at least short-term but whether this translates to better achievement is unresolved. Here, we studied whether 0.5-1.5 years of exposure to a flexible school start system, with the daily choice of an 8 AM or 8:50 AM-start, allowed secondary school students (n = 63-157, 14-21 years) to improve their quarterly school grades in a 4-year longitudinal pre-post design. We investigated whether sleep, changes in sleep or frequency of later starts predicted grade improvements. Mixed model regressions with 5111-16,724 official grades as outcomes did not indicate grade improvements in the flexible system per se or with observed sleep variables nor their changes-the covariates academic quarter, discipline and grade level had a greater effect in our sample. Importantly, our finding that intermittent sleep benefits did not translate into detectable grade changes does not preclude improvements in learning and cognition in our sample. However, it highlights that grades are likely suboptimal to evaluate timetabling interventions despite their importance for future success.

摘要

青少年的睡眠阶段与上学时间过早不匹配,导致急性和慢性睡眠时间减少。这不仅对学习有害,还可能降低职业前景,并扩大社会不平等。推迟上学时间至少在短期内已被证明可以改善睡眠,但这是否能转化为更好的学习成绩还没有定论。在这里,我们研究了暴露于灵活的上学系统 0.5-1.5 年后,是否允许中学生(n=63-157,14-21 岁)每天选择 8 点或 8 点 50 分开始上学,以在 4 年的纵向前后设计中提高他们的季度学校成绩。我们调查了睡眠、睡眠变化或晚起频率是否能预测成绩提高。混合模型回归分析,以 5111-16724 个官方成绩为结果,表明灵活系统本身或观察到的睡眠变量及其变化并没有提高成绩-我们样本中的学业季度、学科和年级水平等协变量的影响更大。重要的是,我们发现间歇性睡眠的好处并没有转化为可检测的成绩变化,这并不排除我们样本中的学习和认知有改善。然而,这突显出尽管成绩对未来的成功很重要,但它们可能不是评估时间表干预的最佳选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed9/8873390/0e46326fde8b/41598_2022_6804_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验