• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

豆科牧草上附生微生物群对青贮草发酵特性、细菌群落组成及其预测功能特性的影响

Fermentation Profiles, Bacterial Community Compositions, and Their Predicted Functional Characteristics of Grass Silage in Response to Epiphytic Microbiota on Legume Forages.

作者信息

Wang Siran, Shao Tao, Li Junfeng, Zhao Jie, Dong Zhihao

机构信息

Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 8;13:830888. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.830888. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2022.830888
PMID:35211107
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8861195/
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of epiphytic microbiota from alfalfa and red clover on the fermentative products, bacterial community compositions, and their predicted functional characteristics in Italian ryegrass silage. By microbiota transplantation and γ-ray irradiation sterilization, the irradiated Italian ryegrass was treated as follows: (1) sterile distilled water (STIR); (2) epiphytic microbiota on Italian ryegrass (IRIR); (3) epiphytic microbiota on alfalfa (IRAL); and (4) epiphytic microbiota on red clover (IRRC). The irradiated Italian ryegrass was ensiled for 1, 3, 7, 15, 30, and 60 days. STIR had similar chemical components with fresh Italian ryegrass. IRAL had higher lactic acid concentrations [64.0 g/kg dry matter (DM)] than IRIR (22.3 g/kg DM) and IRRC (49.4 g/kg DM) on day 3. IRRC had the lowest lactic acid concentrations (59.7 g/kg DM) and the highest pH (4.64), acetic acid (60.4 g/kg DM), ethanol (20.4 g/kg DM), and ammonia nitrogen (82.6 g/kg DM) concentrations and Enterobacteriaceae [9.51 log cfu/g fresh weight (FW)] populations among treatments on day 60. On days 3 and 60, was dominant in both IRIR (42.2%; 72.7%) and IRAL (29.7%; 91.6%), while was predominant in IRRC (85.2%; 48.9%). IRIR and IRAL had lower abundances of "Membrane transport" than IRRC on day 3. IRIR and IRAL had lower abundances of phosphotransacetylase and putative ATP-binding cassette transporter and higher abundances of arginine deiminase on day 3. IRAL had the highest abundance of fructokinase on day 3. Overall, inoculating epiphytic microbiota from different legume forages changed the fermentative products, bacterial community compositions, and their predicted functional characteristics in Italian ryegrass silage. The microbial factors that result in the differences in fermentative profiles between legume forage and grass were revealed. Knowledge regarding the effect of epiphytic microbiota could provide more insights into the improvement of silage quality.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨紫花苜蓿和红三叶草附生微生物群对意大利黑麦草青贮发酵产物、细菌群落组成及其预测功能特性的影响。通过微生物群移植和γ射线辐照灭菌,对辐照后的意大利黑麦草进行如下处理:(1)无菌蒸馏水(STIR);(2)意大利黑麦草上的附生微生物群(IRIR);(3)紫花苜蓿上的附生微生物群(IRAL);(4)红三叶草上的附生微生物群(IRRC)。将辐照后的意大利黑麦草青贮1、3、7、15、30和60天。STIR的化学成分与新鲜意大利黑麦草相似。在第3天,IRAL的乳酸浓度[64.0 g/kg干物质(DM)]高于IRIR(22.3 g/kg DM)和IRRC(49.4 g/kg DM)。在第60天,IRRC的乳酸浓度最低(59.7 g/kg DM),pH值最高(4.64),乙酸(60.4 g/kg DM)、乙醇(20.4 g/kg DM)和氨氮(82.6 g/kg DM)浓度以及肠杆菌科[9.51 log cfu/g鲜重(FW)]数量在各处理中最高。在第3天和第60天, 在IRIR(42.2%;72.7%)和IRAL(29.7%;91.6%)中均占主导地位,而 在IRRC中占优势(85.2%;48.9%)。在第3天,IRIR和IRAL的“膜转运”丰度低于IRRC。在第3天,IRIR和IRAL的磷酸转乙酰酶和假定的ATP结合盒转运蛋白丰度较低,精氨酸脱亚氨酶丰度较高。在第3天,IRAL的果糖激酶丰度最高。总体而言,接种不同豆科牧草的附生微生物群改变了意大利黑麦草青贮的发酵产物、细菌群落组成及其预测功能特性。揭示了导致豆科牧草和禾本科牧草发酵谱差异的微生物因素。关于附生微生物群作用的知识可为提高青贮质量提供更多见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/4d0c6cc1a706/fmicb-13-830888-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/36d675ccb3ab/fmicb-13-830888-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/d3fa2047329f/fmicb-13-830888-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/cbeefd381fcf/fmicb-13-830888-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/e1e666905932/fmicb-13-830888-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/420e5d279665/fmicb-13-830888-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/4d0c6cc1a706/fmicb-13-830888-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/36d675ccb3ab/fmicb-13-830888-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/d3fa2047329f/fmicb-13-830888-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/cbeefd381fcf/fmicb-13-830888-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/e1e666905932/fmicb-13-830888-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/420e5d279665/fmicb-13-830888-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/8861195/4d0c6cc1a706/fmicb-13-830888-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Fermentation Profiles, Bacterial Community Compositions, and Their Predicted Functional Characteristics of Grass Silage in Response to Epiphytic Microbiota on Legume Forages.豆科牧草上附生微生物群对青贮草发酵特性、细菌群落组成及其预测功能特性的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 8;13:830888. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.830888. eCollection 2022.
2
Exploring the ensiling characteristics and bacterial community of red clover inoculated with the epiphytic bacteria from temperate gramineous grasses.探究接种温带禾本科植物附生菌的红三叶草青贮特性及细菌群落。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Jan;132(1):177-188. doi: 10.1111/jam.15234. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Silage fermentation characteristics and microbial diversity of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in response to exogenous microbiota from temperate grasses.苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)对外源温带禾草微生物组的青贮发酵特性及微生物多样性响应
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Oct 22;37(12):204. doi: 10.1007/s11274-021-03155-7.
4
Fermentative products and bacterial community structure of C4 forage silage in response to epiphytic microbiota from C3 forages.C4饲料青贮料响应C3饲料附生微生物群的发酵产物和细菌群落结构
Anim Biosci. 2022 Dec;35(12):1860-1870. doi: 10.5713/ab.21.0543. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
5
Fermentation profile and microbial diversity of temperate grass silage inoculated with epiphytic microbiota from tropical grasses.接种热带牧草附生微生物菌群对温带牧草青贮发酵特性及微生物多样性的影响。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Dec;203(10):6007-6019. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02555-5. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
6
Assessment of inoculating various epiphytic microbiota on fermentative profile and microbial community dynamics in sterile Italian ryegrass.评估接种各种附生微生物菌群对无菌黑麦草发酵特性和微生物群落动态的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2020 Sep;129(3):509-520. doi: 10.1111/jam.14636. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
7
The effects of epiphytic microbiota and chemical composition of Italian ryegrass harvested at different growth stages on silage fermentation.不同生长阶段收获的意大利黑麦草的附生微生物群和化学成分对青贮发酵的影响。
J Sci Food Agric. 2023 Feb;103(3):1385-1393. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12232. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
8
Effect of epiphytic microbiota from napiergrass and Sudan grass on fermentation characteristics and bacterial community in oat silage.黑麦草和苏丹草附生微生物对燕麦青贮发酵特性和细菌群落的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Feb;132(2):919-932. doi: 10.1111/jam.15293. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
9
Effects of various epiphytic microbiota inoculation on the fermentation quality and microbial community dynamics during the ensiling of sterile Napier grass.不同附生微生物接种对无菌象草青贮过程中发酵品质和微生物群落动态的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 May;130(5):1466-1480. doi: 10.1111/jam.14896. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
10
Abundance and diversity of epiphytic microbiota on forage crops and their fermentation characteristic during the ensiling of sterile sudan grass.青贮苏丹草过程中饲料作物附生微生物菌群的丰度和多样性及其发酵特性。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 12;37(2):27. doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02991-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of and on the Characteristics and Microbial Community of Silage.[具体物质1]和[具体物质2]对[青贮饲料名称]青贮特性及微生物群落的影响
Microorganisms. 2025 Jun 23;13(7):1453. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13071453.
2
Recycling of Lycium barbarum by-products and bioactive substance application in silage-Insight into antioxidant activity and the regulation mechanism of anaerobic fermentation.枸杞副产物的循环利用及生物活性物质在青贮中的应用——对抗氧化活性及厌氧发酵调控机制的洞察
BMC Microbiol. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04033-0.
3
Producing high-quality and safe whole-plant quinoa silage through selecting variety and harvest time.

本文引用的文献

1
Microbial community structure, co-occurrence network and fermentation characteristics of woody plant silage.木质植物青贮的微生物群落结构、共生网络和发酵特性。
J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Feb;102(3):1193-1204. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11457. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
2
Exploring the ensiling characteristics and bacterial community of red clover inoculated with the epiphytic bacteria from temperate gramineous grasses.探究接种温带禾本科植物附生菌的红三叶草青贮特性及细菌群落。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Jan;132(1):177-188. doi: 10.1111/jam.15234. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Dynamics of Fermentation Parameters and Bacterial Community in High-Moisture Alfalfa Silage with or without Lactic Acid Bacteria.
通过选择品种和收获时间来生产高质量、安全的藜麦全株青贮饲料。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Mar 14;25(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06326-y.
4
Utilisation of and propionic acid to improve silage quality of amaranth before and after wilting: fermentation quality, microbial communities, and their metabolic pathway.利用丙酸改善苋菜青贮前后的青贮质量:发酵品质、微生物群落及其代谢途径。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jun 6;15:1415290. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1415290. eCollection 2024.
5
Epiphytic microflora and mycotoxin content in meadows-Is plant biodiversity affecting fungal contamination?草地附生微生物区系和真菌毒素含量——植物生物多样性是否影响真菌污染?
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 14;18(9):e0288397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288397. eCollection 2023.
6
Temperature, Salinity and Garlic Additive Shape the Microbial Community during Traditional Beetroot Fermentation Process.温度、盐度和大蒜添加剂在传统甜菜根发酵过程中塑造微生物群落。
Foods. 2023 Aug 16;12(16):3079. doi: 10.3390/foods12163079.
7
Gut microbial diversity and function analysis of the final-instar larvae of Protohermes xanthodes (Megaloptera: Corydalidae).分析巨齿蛉(广翅目:齿蛉科)末龄幼虫的肠道微生物多样性及其功能。
J Insect Sci. 2023 Jul 1;23(4). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iead065.
8
Influence of Cellulase or on the Ensiling Performance and Bacterial Community in Mixed Silage of Alfalfa and .纤维素酶或[此处原文缺失内容]对苜蓿与[此处原文缺失内容]混合青贮发酵品质及细菌群落的影响
Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 8;11(2):426. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020426.
9
Effect of different regions on fermentation profiles, microbial communities, and their metabolomic pathways and properties in Italian ryegrass silage.不同区域对意大利黑麦草青贮发酵特性、微生物群落及其代谢途径和特性的影响
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 16;13:1076499. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1076499. eCollection 2022.
10
Effects of growth stage on the fermentation quality, microbial community, and metabolomic properties of Italian ryegrass ( Lam.) silage.生育期对多花黑麦草青贮发酵品质、微生物群落及代谢组学特性的影响
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 13;13:1054612. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1054612. eCollection 2022.
添加或不添加乳酸菌的高水分苜蓿青贮饲料中发酵参数和细菌群落的动态变化
Microorganisms. 2021 Jun 4;9(6):1225. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9061225.
4
Exploring the bacterial community and fermentation characteristics during silage fermentation of abandoned fresh tea leaves.探究废弃鲜茶叶青贮发酵过程中的细菌群落组成和发酵特性。
Chemosphere. 2021 Nov;283:131234. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131234. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Abundance and diversity of epiphytic microbiota on forage crops and their fermentation characteristic during the ensiling of sterile sudan grass.青贮苏丹草过程中饲料作物附生微生物菌群的丰度和多样性及其发酵特性。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 12;37(2):27. doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02991-3.
6
Sequencing and microbiota transplantation to determine the role of microbiota on the fermentation type of oat silage.测序和微生物移植以确定微生物群在燕麦青贮发酵类型中的作用。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Aug;309:123371. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123371. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
Assessment of inoculating various epiphytic microbiota on fermentative profile and microbial community dynamics in sterile Italian ryegrass.评估接种各种附生微生物菌群对无菌黑麦草发酵特性和微生物群落动态的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2020 Sep;129(3):509-520. doi: 10.1111/jam.14636. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
8
The bacterial community and fermentation quality of mulberry (Morus alba) leaf silage with or without Lactobacillus casei and sucrose.添加了莱克多巴胺的青贮玉米对绵羊瘤胃发酵、微生物群落及血液生化指标的影响
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Dec;293:122059. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122059. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
9
Bacterial Dynamics of Wheat Silage.小麦青贮饲料的细菌动态
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 9;10:1532. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01532. eCollection 2019.
10
Microbial communities and natural fermentation of corn silages prepared with farm bunker-silo in Southwest China.中国西南地区农场筒仓青贮玉米的微生物群落和自然发酵。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Oct;265:282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 8.