Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Department of Ophthalmology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Can J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun;58(3):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.01.023. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
To compare outcomes of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) versus epithelial debridement combined with anterior stromal puncture (ASP) or diamond burr for the treatment of recurrent corneal erosions (RCES) in a large tertiary centre.
Patients with a diagnosis of RCES secondary to trauma or epithelial basement membrane dystrophy who underwent a surgical procedure between 2009 and 2019 were included in the study. The following data were collected: demographics, ocular history, prior medical treatment, ocular surgeries, intervention, complete epithelialization at postoperative week 1, recurrences, and complications. Recurrence was defined as either an objective finding of a corneal epithelial defect or symptoms suggestive of recurrent epithelial erosion on history. Recurrence rate and time to epithelialization were compared between groups.
A total of 97 eyes (73 patients) were included in the study. Mean patient age was 51 ± 16.1 years, and mean follow-up was 474 days. RCES was secondary to epithelial basement membrane dystrophy in 80% (n = 78 of 97), trauma (15%, n = 15 of 97), or idiopathic (4%, n = 4 of 97). Epithelial debridement with ASP was performed in 34 eyes (35%), diamond burr in 33 eyes (33%), and PTK in 30 eyes (31%). Compared with epithelial debridement with ASP (recurrence 29.4%), the recurrence rate was significantly lower for both the diamond burr (9.1%, p = 0.031) and PTK groups (10%, p = 0.048). The diamond burr and PTK groups also had a significantly higher rate of complete epithelialization at 1 week (p < 0.05).
Compared with epithelial debridement with ASP, diamond burr and PTK have significantly lower rates of recurrence and time to epithelialization and may be considered first for surgical management of RCES.
比较光性角膜切削术(PTK)与上皮清创联合前基质穿刺(ASP)或钻石刀在大型三级中心治疗复发性角膜上皮糜烂(RCES)的结果。
纳入 2009 年至 2019 年间因外伤或上皮基底膜营养不良导致 RCES 而接受手术的患者。收集以下数据:人口统计学、眼部病史、既往药物治疗、眼部手术、干预措施、术后第 1 周完全上皮化、复发和并发症。复发定义为角膜上皮缺损的客观发现或病史中提示复发性上皮糜烂的症状。比较各组之间的复发率和上皮化时间。
本研究共纳入 97 只眼(73 例)。患者平均年龄为 51±16.1 岁,平均随访时间为 474 天。80%(n=78 of 97)的 RCES 继发于上皮基底膜营养不良,15%(n=15 of 97)继发于外伤,4%(n=4 of 97)为特发性。34 只眼(35%)行上皮清创联合 ASP,33 只眼(33%)行钻石刀,30 只眼(31%)行 PTK。与上皮清创联合 ASP (复发率 29.4%)相比,钻石刀(9.1%,p=0.031)和 PTK 组(10%,p=0.048)的复发率显著降低。钻石刀和 PTK 组在第 1 周完全上皮化的比例也显著更高(p<0.05)。
与上皮清创联合 ASP 相比,钻石刀和 PTK 的复发率和上皮化时间明显较低,可能是 RCES 手术治疗的首选方法。