Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1481-1489. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04383-8. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
While conservative management is commonly promoted for simple elbow dislocations, the importance of primary surgical treatment in these injuries is still undetermined. The objective of this study was to report patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sports (RTS) and joint stability using ultrasound in patients following conservative or surgical treatment after simple elbow dislocation.
Patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months after conservative (CT) or surgical treatment (ST) following simple elbow dislocation were included in this retrospective study. To evaluate patients' postoperative outcome and satisfaction, the Elbow Self-Assessment Score (ESAS) was used, and validated scores such as the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), the Quick Disability of Arm and Shoulder Score (Quick-DASH) and RTS were assessed. For objective assessment of residual joint instability, a standardized clinical examination as well as a dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the affected and the contralateral elbow was performed.
Forty-four patients (26 women, 18 men) with an average age of 41.5 ± 15.3 years were available for follow-up survey (65.5 ± 30.4 months; range 26-123). 21 patients were treated conservatively and twenty-three patients received surgical treatment. CT and ST resulted in similar outcome with regard to ROM, ESAS (CT: 99.4 ± 1.5; ST: 99.8 ± 0.3), MEPS (CT: 97.3 ± 6.8 points; ST: 98.7 ± 3.3) and Quick-DASH (CT: 7.8 ± 10.4; ST: 6.3 ± 7.9) (n.s.). There was no difference in elbow stability and laxity measured by ultrasound between the study groups and compared to the healthy elbow (n.s.). Two patients of the CT group (10%) complained about persistent subjective elbow instability. RTS was faster after surgical compared to conservative treatment (p = 0.036).
Both, conservative and surgical treatment results in high patient satisfaction and good-to-excellent functional outcome after simple elbow dislocation. Even though ultrasound evaluation showed no significant differences in joint gapping between groups, 10% of conservatively treated patients complained about severe subjective instability. Surgically treated patients returned faster to their preoperatively performed sports. Thus, primary surgical treatment may be beneficial for high demanding patients.
Therapeutic study, Level III.
对于单纯性肘关节脱位,通常提倡保守治疗,但此类损伤中初次手术治疗的重要性仍未确定。本研究的目的是报告单纯性肘关节脱位患者接受保守或手术治疗后,使用超声评估患者的患者报告结局测量(PROMs)、重返运动(RTS)和关节稳定性。
本回顾性研究纳入了至少在接受单纯性肘关节脱位保守(CT)或手术(ST)治疗后 24 个月随访的患者。为了评估患者的术后结果和满意度,使用肘部自我评估评分(ESAS),并评估了经过验证的评分,如 Mayo 肘部功能评分(MEPS)、快速残疾上肢评分(Quick-DASH)和 RTS。为了客观评估残余关节不稳定,对患侧和健侧肘部进行了标准化的临床检查和动态超声评估。
44 名患者(26 名女性,18 名男性)纳入随访调查,平均年龄为 41.5±15.3 岁(范围 26-123 个月)。21 名患者接受了保守治疗,23 名患者接受了手术治疗。在 ROM、ESAS(CT:99.4±1.5;ST:99.8±0.3)、MEPS(CT:97.3±6.8 分;ST:98.7±3.3)和 Quick-DASH(CT:7.8±10.4;ST:6.3±7.9)方面,CT 和 ST 的结果相似(n.s.)。与健康肘部相比,两组的超声测量的肘部稳定性和松弛度无差异(n.s.)。CT 组的 2 名患者(10%)抱怨持续存在主观肘部不稳定。与保守治疗相比,手术治疗的 RTS 更快(p=0.036)。
单纯性肘关节脱位后,无论是保守治疗还是手术治疗,都能获得较高的患者满意度和良好至优秀的功能结果。尽管超声评估显示组间关节间隙无显著差异,但 10%的保守治疗患者抱怨严重的主观不稳定。手术治疗的患者更快地恢复到术前进行的运动。因此,对于高需求的患者,初次手术治疗可能是有益的。
治疗研究,III 级。