Suppr超能文献

验证国际创伤访谈(ITI)在立陶宛样本中用于 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的临床评估。

Validation of the International Trauma Interview (ITI) for the Clinical Assessment of ICD-11 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD) in a Lithuanian Sample.

机构信息

Center for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Feb 23;13(1):2037905. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2037905. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 11 revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) includes a new diagnosis of complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). The International Trauma Interview (ITI) is a novel clinician-administered diagnostic interview for the assessment of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the ITI in a Lithuanian sample in relation to interrater agreement, latent structure, internal reliability, as well as convergent and discriminant validity.

METHOD

In total, 103 adults with a history of various traumatic experiences participated in the study. The sample was predominantly female (83.5%), with a mean age of 32.64 years ( = 9.36). For the assessment of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD, the ITI and the self-report International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) were used. Mental health indicators, such as depression, anxiety, and dissociation, were measured using self-report questionnaires. The latent structure of the ITI was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In order to test the convergent and discriminant validity of the ITI we conducted a structural equation model (SEM).

RESULTS

Overall, based on the ITI, 18.4% of participants fulfilled diagnostic criteria for PTSD and 21.4% for CPTSD. A second-order two-factor CFA model of the ITI PTSD and disturbances in self-organization (DSO) symptoms demonstrated a good fit. The associations with various mental health indicators supported the convergent and discriminant validity of the ITI. The clinician-administered ITI and self-report ITQ had poor to moderate diagnostic agreement across different symptom clusters.

CONCLUSION

The ITI is a reliable and valid tool for assessing and diagnosing ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD.

摘要

背景

《国际疾病分类》第 11 次修订版(ICD-11)包括了一种新的诊断,即复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)。《国际创伤访谈》(ITI)是一种新的用于评估 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的临床医生管理的诊断访谈。

目的

本研究旨在评估 ITI 在立陶宛样本中的心理测量特性,包括评定者间一致性、潜在结构、内部一致性,以及聚合和区分效度。

方法

共有 103 名有各种创伤经历的成年人参与了这项研究。该样本主要为女性(83.5%),平均年龄为 32.64 岁(标准差=9.36)。为了评估 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD,使用了 ITI 和自我报告的《国际创伤问卷》(ITQ)。使用自我报告问卷测量了抑郁、焦虑和分离等心理健康指标。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估 ITI 的潜在结构。为了测试 ITI 的聚合和区分效度,我们进行了结构方程模型(SEM)。

结果

总体而言,根据 ITI,18.4%的参与者符合 PTSD 的诊断标准,21.4%的参与者符合 CPTSD 的诊断标准。ITI 的 PTSD 和自我组织障碍(DSO)症状的二阶两因素 CFA 模型显示出良好的拟合度。与各种心理健康指标的关联支持了 ITI 的聚合和区分效度。临床管理的 ITI 和自我报告的 ITQ 在不同的症状群之间有较差到中等的诊断一致性。

结论

ITI 是一种可靠和有效的工具,可用于评估和诊断 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3a/8881058/bd610f064d6c/ZEPT_A_2037905_F0001_B.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验