Suppr超能文献

使用生态瞬时评估和连续心率监测在自然环境中测量应激反应的可行性。

Feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment and continuous heart rate monitoring to measure stress reactivity in natural settings.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 9;17(3):e0264200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264200. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The way people respond to stressful situations (i.e., stress reactivity) varies widely. Researchers typically measure stress reactivity in controlled studies, but this is limited because laboratory stressors cannot capture the variety, severity, or duration of stressors that individuals face in their daily lives. The present study examined the feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and a wireless electrocardiography (ECG) patch to develop an understanding of stress reactivity in natural settings. Thirty-five adult women completed EMA surveys about stressors they were exposed to while wearing a wireless ECG monitor for 7 consecutive days. Daily stressors were measured using seven questions adapted from the Daily Inventory of Stressful Events and a stressor interval was defined as the presence of at least one stressor during the EMA survey prompt. Participants wore the Cardea SOLO wireless ECG monitor (Cardiac Insight Inc., Bellevue, WA) to continuously track their heart rate. Participant-specific differences in 5-minute heart rate variability (HRV) between intervals when participants did and did not report stressors were calculated and displayed in a heat map. Survey response rate was satisfactory (72.0%, n = 588) and nearly all participants (33 out of 35) reported both stressor and non-stressor intervals. Each participant reported at least one stressor on approximately 35% of completed surveys while wearing the ECG patch. Mean wear time (6.6 days) and the duration of analyzable data with an ECG monitor were close to the 7-day study period. While many participants had lower HRV during stressor versus non-stressor intervals, the magnitude and direction of these differences varied widely. In summary, we found that a 7-day sampling scheme combining ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with HRV measured using continuous ECG monitoring was feasible and effective in capturing a variety of daily stressors and measuring autonomic stress reactivity.

摘要

人们对压力情境的反应方式(即压力反应性)差异很大。研究人员通常在对照研究中测量压力反应性,但这是有限的,因为实验室压力源无法捕捉个体在日常生活中面临的压力源的多样性、严重程度或持续时间。本研究探讨了使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)和无线心电图(ECG)贴片在自然环境中了解压力反应性的可行性。35 名成年女性在连续 7 天佩戴无线 ECG 监测器的同时完成了关于她们所经历的压力源的 EMA 调查。使用从每日压力事件清单中改编的七个问题来衡量日常压力源,并且将压力源间隔定义为在 EMA 调查提示期间存在至少一个压力源。参与者佩戴 Cardea SOLO 无线 ECG 监测器(Cardiac Insight Inc.,Bellevue,WA)来连续跟踪他们的心率。在参与者报告和未报告压力源的间隔之间计算参与者特定的 5 分钟心率变异性(HRV)的差异,并以热图显示。调查响应率令人满意(72.0%,n=588),几乎所有参与者(35 人中的 33 人)都报告了压力源和非压力源间隔。每个参与者在佩戴 ECG 贴片时大约有 35%的完成调查中报告了至少一个压力源。平均佩戴时间(6.6 天)和带有 ECG 监测器的可分析数据的持续时间接近 7 天的研究期。虽然许多参与者在压力源间隔期间的 HRV 较低,但这些差异的幅度和方向差异很大。总之,我们发现,结合 EMA 与使用连续 ECG 监测测量的 HRV 的 7 天采样方案在捕获各种日常压力源和测量自主压力反应性方面是可行且有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b48/8906632/2e7980e3167b/pone.0264200.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验