Biomechanics and Sport Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Sports Physiotherapy Lab, School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Oct;103(10):1951-1957. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
To determine lumbar multifidus (LM) muscle activation deficits in individuals with impaired lumbopelvic control (iLPC) based on musculoskeletal ultrasound in conjunction with electrical stimulation approach and the correlation between back extension force and LM activation.
A cross-sectional study design.
A university laboratory.
Fifty participants (25 iLPC and 25 no low back pain [NoLBP]) were recruited from the university physical therapy clinic and surrounding areas.
The musculoskeletal ultrasound was used to measure LM thickness at rest, maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), and electrical stimulation combined with MVIC, and a handheld dynamometer was used to record force during MVIC and electrical stimulation combined with MVIC. These data were used to derive LM activation (LM) and percentage force generation (Force).
The iLPC group had significantly lower LM (17%) than the NoLBP group (P<.05). No significant difference was seen in Force between the NoLBP and iLPC groups (P>.05). No significant correlation was seen between LM and Force (P>.05).
The findings support the utility of our protocol to determine LM activation deficits. The lower LM activation in iLPC group suggests that individuals with iLPC were unable to fully recruit the motor units available in LM. Force generation measurements may not be an appropriate approach to determine such deficits in LM.
通过肌骨超声联合电刺激的方法,确定腰椎骨盆控制障碍(iLPC)个体的腰多裂肌(LM)肌肉激活不足,并确定伸腰力与 LM 激活之间的相关性。
横断面研究设计。
大学实验室。
从大学物理治疗诊所和周边地区招募了 50 名参与者(25 名 iLPC 和 25 名无下腰痛[NoLBP])。
使用肌骨超声测量 LM 在休息时、最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)和电刺激联合 MVIC 时的厚度,使用手持测力计记录 MVIC 和电刺激联合 MVIC 时的力。这些数据用于得出 LM 激活(LM)和力产生百分比(Force)。
iLPC 组的 LM(17%)明显低于 NoLBP 组(P<.05)。NoLBP 组和 iLPC 组之间的 Force 无显著差异(P>.05)。LM 和 Force 之间无显著相关性(P>.05)。
这些发现支持我们的方案用于确定 LM 激活不足的效用。iLPC 组的 LM 激活较低表明,iLPC 个体无法充分募集 LM 中可用的运动单位。力产生测量可能不是确定 LM 中这种不足的适当方法。