Naleini Farhad, Hassani Mohammad, Bagherhosseini Najme, Sobhiyeh Mohammadreza
Department of Radiology, Clinical Research Development center, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Department of General Surgery,Clinical Research Development Center, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
J Vasc Nurs. 2022 Mar;40(1):43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
Ultrasound of the saphenous vein and measurement of the vein diameter may have a role in determining the severity of varicose veins. This study aimed to compare the saphenous vein diameter with the CEAP classification, as the reference standard in determining the severity of chronic venous diseases, in patients with lower limbs varicose veins free from saphenous vein reflux.
In this cross-sectional study, 100 patients with lower limbs varicose veins (saphenous vein) and free from saphenous vein reflux were enrolled. Demographic data (age, gender, body mass index (BMI)) were collected using a checklist. The severity of varicose veins was determined using the standard CEAP classification. The saphenous vein diameter was measured using ultrasonography.
Mean age of the patients was 43 years and there were 68 female patients. According to the CEAP classification, 13 patients had no varicose veins (CEAP class C0). However, 87 patients had varicose veins (65 patients with class C1, one patient with class C2, and 21 patients with class C3). Mean saphenous vein diameter in the whole sample was 6.7 mm. There was no significant relationship between the severity of varicose veins determined by CEAP classification and mean saphenous vein diameter measured by ultrasound. Mean saphenous vein diameter in C0, C1, C2, and C3 groups were respectively 1.7 mm, 6.7 mm, 8 mm, and 8.7 mm (P= 0.71). On the other hand, mean saphenous vein diameter was higher significantly in those with higher body mass index (BMI) and among older patients.
The results of this study showed that saphenous vein diameter did not differ significantly between CEAP C0 through C4 classes. However, the severity of varicose vein was more prominent in older patients and those with higher BMI.
大隐静脉超声检查及静脉直径测量可能在判定静脉曲张严重程度方面发挥作用。本研究旨在比较大隐静脉直径与CEAP分级(作为判定慢性静脉疾病严重程度的参考标准)在无大隐静脉反流的下肢静脉曲张患者中的情况。
在这项横断面研究中,纳入了100例下肢(大隐静脉)静脉曲张且无大隐静脉反流的患者。使用清单收集人口统计学数据(年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI))。采用标准的CEAP分级判定静脉曲张的严重程度。使用超声检查测量大隐静脉直径。
患者的平均年龄为43岁,女性患者有68例。根据CEAP分级,13例患者无静脉曲张(CEAP C0级)。然而,87例患者有静脉曲张(65例C1级,1例C2级,21例C3级)。整个样本的大隐静脉平均直径为6.7毫米。CEAP分级判定的静脉曲张严重程度与超声测量的大隐静脉平均直径之间无显著相关性。C0、C1、C2和C3组的大隐静脉平均直径分别为1.7毫米、6.7毫米、8毫米和8.7毫米(P = 0.71)。另一方面,体重指数(BMI)较高者及年龄较大患者的大隐静脉平均直径显著更高。
本研究结果表明,CEAP C0至C4级之间大隐静脉直径无显著差异。然而,静脉曲张的严重程度在年龄较大患者及BMI较高者中更为突出。