Suppr超能文献

用于非典型帕金森病的脑深部电刺激:疗效与安全性的系统评价

Deep brain stimulation for atypical parkinsonism: A systematic review on efficacy and safety.

作者信息

Artusi Carlo Alberto, Rinaldi Domiziana, Balestrino Roberta, Lopiano Leonardo

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Torino, Italy; Neurology 2 Unit, A.O.U, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Torino, Italy.

Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs (NESMOS), Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-00189, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2022 Mar;96:109-118. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atypical Parkinsonisms (APs) -including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)- are neurodegenerative diseases lacking satisfying symptomatic therapies. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established neurosurgical option for advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Although DBS effectiveness in PD fed expectations for the treatment of APs, DBS is still not recommended for APs on the basis of expert consensus and lack of clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review, we sought to analyze current evidence on the safety and efficacy of DBS in APs, discussing clinical indications, anatomical targets, and ethical issues.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed for studies reporting the outcome of patients with APs treated with DBS.

RESULTS

We identified 25 eligible studies for a total of 66 patients with APs treated with DBS: 31 PSP, 22 MSA, 12 DLB, 1 unspecified parkinsonism with tongue tremor. Targeted nuclei were subthalamic nucleus (STN), globus pallidus pars-interna (GPi), pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN), and nucleus basalis of Meynert (nbM). Only 3/25 studies were randomized controlled trials, and most studies showed a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Taking into account study biases and confounding factors, current evidence does not support the use of DBS in APs. However, some interesting insights arise from the literature, such as the high frequency of cognitive/neurobehavioral issues in MSA patients treated with STN-DBS, the low frequency of complications in trials of nbM-DBS for DLB, and the possible good response of dystonic symptoms in PSP with GPi DBS.

摘要

背景

非典型帕金森综合征(APs)——包括进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)、多系统萎缩(MSA)和路易体痴呆(DLB)——是缺乏令人满意的对症治疗方法的神经退行性疾病。深部脑刺激(DBS)是晚期帕金森病(PD)已确立的神经外科治疗选择。尽管DBS在PD中的有效性引发了对APs治疗的期待,但基于专家共识和缺乏临床试验,DBS仍不被推荐用于APs。

目的

在本系统评价中,我们试图分析DBS治疗APs安全性和有效性的现有证据,讨论临床适应证、解剖靶点和伦理问题。

方法

遵循PRISMA指南,我们在PubMed中系统检索报告DBS治疗APs患者结局的研究。

结果

我们确定了25项符合条件的研究,共66例接受DBS治疗的APs患者:31例PSP、22例MSA、12例DLB、1例未明确的伴有舌震颤的帕金森综合征。靶向核团为丘脑底核(STN)、苍白球内侧部(GPi)、脚桥核(PPN)和Meynert基底核(nbM)。25项研究中只有3项是随机对照试验,且大多数研究显示存在高偏倚风险。

结论

考虑到研究偏倚和混杂因素,现有证据不支持在APs中使用DBS。然而,文献中出现了一些有趣的见解,例如接受STN-DBS治疗的MSA患者认知/神经行为问题的高发生率、nbM-DBS治疗DLB试验中并发症的低发生率,以及PSP患者接受GPi DBS治疗时肌张力障碍症状可能的良好反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验